Kaylee Browning et al v. Unilever United States, Inc.
Filing
185
JUDGMENT by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. T IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs take nothing from this action, and Defendant may seek to recover its costs pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d). #183 (es)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SOUTHERN DIVISION
11
12
13
KAYLEE BROWNING and SARAH
BASILE, on behalf of themselves and
all others similarly situated,
14
15
16
17
Plaintiffs,
v.
UNILEVER UNITED STATES, INC.,
Defendant.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 8:16-CV-2210-AG-KES
sf-3976749
Case No. 8:16-CV-2210-AG-KES
JUDGMENT
The Hon. Andrew J. Guilford
1
The Court hereby enters judgment in favor of Defendant Unilever United
2
States, Inc. (“Unilever”) and against Plaintiffs Kaylee Browning and Sarah Basile
3
(“Plaintiffs”) for the reasons described in the Court’s Order Granting Unilever’s
4
Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 183), following which there are no
5
remaining claims at issue in this case.
6
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment
7
is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs take nothing from
8
this action, and Defendant may seek to recover its costs pursuant to Federal Rule of
9
Civil Procedure 54(d).
10
11
12
13
Dated: January 9, 2019
_______________________________
The Hon. Andrew J. Guilford
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 8:16-CV-2210-AG-KES
sf- 3976749
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?