Kaylee Browning et al v. Unilever United States, Inc.

Filing 185

JUDGMENT by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. T IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs take nothing from this action, and Defendant may seek to recover its costs pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d). #183 (es)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SOUTHERN DIVISION 11 12 13 KAYLEE BROWNING and SARAH BASILE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, 14 15 16 17 Plaintiffs, v. UNILEVER UNITED STATES, INC., Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JUDGMENT CASE NO. 8:16-CV-2210-AG-KES sf-3976749 Case No. 8:16-CV-2210-AG-KES JUDGMENT The Hon. Andrew J. Guilford 1 The Court hereby enters judgment in favor of Defendant Unilever United 2 States, Inc. (“Unilever”) and against Plaintiffs Kaylee Browning and Sarah Basile 3 (“Plaintiffs”) for the reasons described in the Court’s Order Granting Unilever’s 4 Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 183), following which there are no 5 remaining claims at issue in this case. 6 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment 7 is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs take nothing from 8 this action, and Defendant may seek to recover its costs pursuant to Federal Rule of 9 Civil Procedure 54(d). 10 11 12 13 Dated: January 9, 2019 _______________________________ The Hon. Andrew J. Guilford 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JUDGMENT CASE NO. 8:16-CV-2210-AG-KES sf- 3976749 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?