Kunshan Capaci Trading Company v. Radii Footwear Incorporated et al

Filing 46

JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton, in favor of Kunshan Capaci Trading Company against Radii Footwear Incorporated. The Court hereby finds and orders as follows: 1. That Plaintiff recover the sum of $314,439.31 from Defendant Radii; 2. That P laintiff recover its prejudgment interest from Defendant Radii, at the California statutory rate of 10 percent per annum, or $86.14 per day, from the date this action was filed, December 22, 2016, to the date Judgment is entered, August 1, 2017; and 3. That Plaintiff recover its costs. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mba)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 KUNSHAN CAPACI TRADING COMPANY, a Chinese Limited Liability Company, ) Case No. 8:16-cv-2236-JLS-DFMx ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) JUDGMENT ) RADII FOOTWEAR ) INCORPORATED, a California ) corporation, and DOES 1 THROUGH ) 10, INCLUSIVE,, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 1 On July 27, 2017, the Court issued an order granting summary judgment in 2 favor of Plaintiff Kunshan Capaci Trading Company and against Defendant Radii 3 Footwear, Inc. (Order, Doc. 44.) The Court hereby finds and orders as follows: 4 1. That Plaintiff recover the sum of $314,439.31 from Defendant Radii; 5 2. That Plaintiff recover its prejudgment interest from Defendant Radii, at 6 the California statutory rate of 10 percent per annum, or $86.14 per day, from the 7 date this action was filed, December 22, 2016, to the date Judgment is entered, 8 August 1, 2017; and 9 10 3. That Plaintiff recover its costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 Dated: August 1, 2017 13 14 15 __________________________________ Hon. Josephine L. Staton United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?