Naora Ben-Dov v. Shoshana Zelda Sragow et al
Filing
87
JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick, in favor of Allen Philip Sragow, Shoshana Zelda Sragow, Tamar M. Breton against Naora Ben Dov. The case is dismissed, with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
NAORA BEN-DOV,
CASE NO. 8:17-cv-00122-DFM
11
Plaintiff,
JUDGMENT
12
vs.
13
MOTION HEARING: October 17, 2017 at
10:00 A.M.
SHOSHANA ZELDA
SRAGOW, and DOES ONE TO
TEN,
10
14
THE HON. DOUGLAS F. MCCORMICK
15
16
17
18
Defendants.
This is a suit for accounting and declaratory relief, breach of trustee duty,
fraud, elder abuse and conversion, fraudulent misrepresentation and fraudulent
19
concealment, and unjust enrichment, brought by Plaintiff Naora Ben Dov against
20
21
Defendants Shoshana Sragow, Allen Sragow and Tamar Breton. Defendant
22
Shoshana Sragow moved the Court (Dkt. 45), and Defendants Allen Sragow and
23
Tamar Breton moved the Court (Dkt. 55), for summary judgment pursuant to
24
1
25
JUDGMENT
1
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. The Court reviewed the moving and the
2
opposition papers and, on October 17, 2017, held a hearing on the motion. Based
3
on the submissions and the arguments, there is no dispute as to any material facts
4
and the movant is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law; for the reasons set forth
5
6
7
8
9
10
in this Court’s Order Granting Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF
No. 79),
The Court hereby enters judgment in favor of Defendants Shoshana Sragow,
Allen Sragow and Tamar Breton and against Plaintiff Naora Ben-Dov. The case is
dismissed, with prejudice.
11
Dated: December 6, 2017
_____________________________
12
13
14
Honorable Douglas F. McCormick
United States Magistrate Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2
25
JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?