Naora Ben-Dov v. Shoshana Zelda Sragow et al

Filing 87

JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick, in favor of Allen Philip Sragow, Shoshana Zelda Sragow, Tamar M. Breton against Naora Ben Dov. The case is dismissed, with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)

Download PDF
  JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 NAORA BEN-DOV, CASE NO. 8:17-cv-00122-DFM 11 Plaintiff, JUDGMENT 12 vs. 13 MOTION HEARING: October 17, 2017 at 10:00 A.M. SHOSHANA ZELDA SRAGOW, and DOES ONE TO TEN, 10 14 THE HON. DOUGLAS F. MCCORMICK 15 16 17 18 Defendants. This is a suit for accounting and declaratory relief, breach of trustee duty, fraud, elder abuse and conversion, fraudulent misrepresentation and fraudulent 19 concealment, and unjust enrichment, brought by Plaintiff Naora Ben Dov against 20 21 Defendants Shoshana Sragow, Allen Sragow and Tamar Breton. Defendant 22 Shoshana Sragow moved the Court (Dkt. 45), and Defendants Allen Sragow and 23 Tamar Breton moved the Court (Dkt. 55), for summary judgment pursuant to 24 1 25 JUDGMENT   1 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. The Court reviewed the moving and the 2 opposition papers and, on October 17, 2017, held a hearing on the motion. Based 3 on the submissions and the arguments, there is no dispute as to any material facts 4 and the movant is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law; for the reasons set forth 5 6 7 8 9 10 in this Court’s Order Granting Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 79), The Court hereby enters judgment in favor of Defendants Shoshana Sragow, Allen Sragow and Tamar Breton and against Plaintiff Naora Ben-Dov. The case is dismissed, with prejudice. 11 Dated: December 6, 2017 _____________________________ 12 13 14 Honorable Douglas F. McCormick United States Magistrate Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2 25 JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?