Young Hee Park v. Blooming Deals et al

Filing 16

MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge David O. Carter. The Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later than May 22, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (see document for details). (dro)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. SA CV 17-0221-DOC (JCGx)

Date: May 18, 2017

Title: YOUNG HEE PARK V BLOOMING DEALS, ET AL

PRESENT: The Honorable DAVID O. CARTER, U.S. District Judge
Deborah Goltz
Courtroom Clerk

None
Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF:
None Present

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:
None Present

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF
PROSECUTION

The Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later
than May 22, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.
It is the responsibility of plaintiff to respond promptly to all Orders and to prosecute the
action diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time to respond. If
necessary, plaintiff(s) must also pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon default of any
defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by the Court,
Local Rule 7-1.
No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order
will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date
upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due.

MINUTES FORM 11
CIVIL-GEN

CV (10/08)

Initials of Deputy Clerk: djg

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Page 1 of 1