Young Hee Park v. Armando Perez et al

Filing 25

JUDGMENT by Judge Andrew J. Guilford, in favor of Young Hee Park against Andrew Chiao in the amount of $12,625.00. Additionally, Defendant Andrew Chiao is ordered to provide accessible parking spaces at the property located at 12083 Garden Grove Blvd. Garden Grove, California, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines. Related to: Order on Motion for Default Judgment 24 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)

Download PDF
1 2 JS-6 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 CASE NO. 8:17-CV-00335-AG-AS Young Hee Park Plaintiff, JUDGMENT RE: DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT ANDREW CHIAO vs. Armando Perez d/b/a Vega’s Beauty Salon, an individual; Andrew Chiao, an individual and Does 1-10 inclusive, Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JUDGMENT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Upon review of the court files, the application for default judgment, the declarations submitted in support of the default judgment, and the evidence presented having been fully considered, it is hereby ordered and adjudged that plaintiff Young Hee Park shall have JUDGMENT in her favor in the amount of $12,625.00 against Defendant Andrew Chiao. Additionally, Defendant Andrew Chiao is ordered to provide accessible parking spaces at the property located at 12083 Garden Grove Blvd. Garden Grove, California, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines. 9 10 11 12 13 Dated: February 12, 2018 14 15 _______________________________ Honorable Andrew J. Guilford United States District Judge Central District of California 16 17 18 19 Presented by: Jong Yun Kim, Esq. (213) 351-9400 jongkimlaw@hotmail.com Attorney for Plaintiff 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROPOSED JUDGMENT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROPOSED JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?