Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. Air Balance Energy Management et al

Filing 10

JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton, in favor of the Plans and against Individual Defendant, jointly and severally, in the amount of $46,873.03. See judgment for further information. Related to: Stipulation for Judgment 9 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SHEET METAL WORKERS’ PENSION PLAN OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA AND NEVADA; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SHEET METAL WORKERS’ HEALTH PLAN OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA AND NEVADA; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SHEET METAL JOINT APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING COMMITTEE; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SHEET METAL WORKERS’ LOCAL 105 RETIREE HEALTH PLAN; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SHEET METAL WORKERS’ 401(A) PLAN; SHEET METAL WORKERS’ INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, LOCAL UNION NO. 105 UNION DUES CHECK-OFF AND DEFERRED SAVINGS FUND; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LABOR MANAGEMENT COOPERATION TRUST; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SHEET METAL INDUSTRY FUND OF LOS ANGELES, 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiffs, v. AIR BALANCE ENERGY MANAGEMENT; JEROME EDWARD ORTIZ; individual, Defendants. Case No. 8:17-cv-0349 JLS (Ex) Hon. Josephine L. Staton JUDGMENT 1 Pursuant to the Stipulation by and between Plaintiffs Board of Trustees of the 2 Sheet Metal Workers’ Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada 3 (“Pension Plan”); Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers’ Health Plan of 4 Southern California, Arizona and Nevada (“Health Plan”); Board of Trustees of the 5 Southern California Sheet Metal Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee 6 (“JATC”); Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers’ Local 105 Retiree Health Plan 7 (“Retirees Plan”); Board of Trustees of the Southern California Sheet Metal Workers’ 8 401(a) Plan (“401(a) Plan”); Sheet Metal Workers’ International Association, Local 9 Union No. 105 Union Dues Check-Off and Deferred Savings Fund (“Dues and Savings 10 Fund”); Board of Trustees of the Southern California Labor Management Cooperation 11 Trust (“LMCT”); and Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Industry Fund of Los Angeles 12 (“Industry Fund”) (collectively the “Plans” or “Trust Funds”), and Defendants, JEROME 13 EDWARD ORTIZ (“Individual Defendant”); and AIR BALANCE ENERGY 14 MANAGEMENT (“Company”) the Court has considered the matter fully and concluded 15 that good cause exists to approve the parties' Stipulation in its entirety. 16 The Court therefore ENTERS JUDGMENT pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 17 Procedure 58(a) as follows: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND 18 DECREED: 19 1. The Company and Individual Defendant is indebted to the Plans in the total 20 amount of $46,873.03 as follows: contributions (including the "Savings Deferral" which 21 are wages deducted from employee paychecks) in the amount of $25,286.94 for the 22 delinquent work months of October 2016, November 2016, and December 2016; 23 $6,057.39 in liquidated damages for late payment or nonpayment of contributions for the 24 work months of October 2016, November 2016, and December 2016; $3,028.70 in 25 interest for late payment or nonpayment of contributions for the work months of October 26 2016, November 2016, and December 2016; attorney's fees in the amount of $12,500.00. 27 28 2. Judgment is entered in favor of the Plans and against the Company and Individual Defendant, jointly and severally, in the amount of $46,873.03 in delinquent 1 1 employee benefit plan contributions, accrued liquidated damages, interest, attorney fees 2 and costs, together with post-judgment interest thereon at the rate of 12% per annum as of 3 the date of the Judgment. 4 3. This Court retains jurisdiction over this matter through June 1, 2018 to 5 enforce the terms of any judgment entered hereunder, to order appropriate injunctive and 6 equitable relief, to make appropriate orders of contempt, and to increase the amount of 7 judgment based upon additional sums owed to the Plans by Defendants. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 27, 2017 10 11 12 _______________________________ Hon. Josephine L. Staton United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?