Dondi Stevens v. Dess Richardson, Esquire et al

Filing 30

MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT JOYCE E. DUDLEYWITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FRCP 4(m) by Judge John F. Walter: On 6/19/2017, the Court ordered Plaintiff Dondi Stevens (Plaintiff) to show cause, in writing, no later than 6/30/2 017, why the remaining defendant in this action, Joyce E. Dudley, should not be dismissed pursuant to FRCP 4(m). The Court expressly warned Plaintiff that failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause would result in the dismissal of this action. Plaintiff failed to respond to the Order to Show Cause on or before 6/30/2017. Accordingly, Defendant Joyce E. Dudley is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 4(m). (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JS-6 CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL Case No. SA CV 17-427-JFW(JCGx) Title: Dondi Stevens -v- Dess Richardson, Esquire, et al. Date: July 13, 2017 PRESENT: HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Shannon Reilly Courtroom Deputy None Present Court Reporter ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: None PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS: None ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT JOYCE E. DUDLEY WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(m) On June 19, 2017, the Court ordered Plaintiff Dondi Stevens (“Plaintiff”) to show cause, in writing, no later than June 30, 2017, why the remaining defendant in this action, Joyce E. Dudley, should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). The Court expressly warned Plaintiff that failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause would result in the dismissal of this action. Plaintiff failed to respond to the Order to Show Cause on or before June 30, 2017. Accordingly, Defendant Joyce E. Dudley is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). IT IS SO ORDERED. Page 1 of 1 Initials of Deputy Clerk sr

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?