Dondi Stevens v. Dess Richardson, Esquire et al
Filing
30
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT JOYCE E. DUDLEYWITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FRCP 4(m) by Judge John F. Walter: On 6/19/2017, the Court ordered Plaintiff Dondi Stevens (Plaintiff) to show cause, in writing, no later than 6/30/2 017, why the remaining defendant in this action, Joyce E. Dudley, should not be dismissed pursuant to FRCP 4(m). The Court expressly warned Plaintiff that failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause would result in the dismissal of this action. Plaintiff failed to respond to the Order to Show Cause on or before 6/30/2017. Accordingly, Defendant Joyce E. Dudley is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 4(m). (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JS-6
CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL
Case No.
SA CV 17-427-JFW(JCGx)
Title:
Dondi Stevens -v- Dess Richardson, Esquire, et al.
Date: July 13, 2017
PRESENT:
HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Shannon Reilly
Courtroom Deputy
None Present
Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS:
None
PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS):
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:
None
ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT JOYCE E. DUDLEY
WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL
RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(m)
On June 19, 2017, the Court ordered Plaintiff Dondi Stevens (“Plaintiff”) to show cause, in
writing, no later than June 30, 2017, why the remaining defendant in this action, Joyce E. Dudley,
should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). The Court expressly
warned Plaintiff that failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause would result in the dismissal of
this action.
Plaintiff failed to respond to the Order to Show Cause on or before June 30, 2017.
Accordingly, Defendant Joyce E. Dudley is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Page 1 of 1
Initials of Deputy Clerk sr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?