Craig Anderson v. Nancy Berryhill

Filing 7

MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not filed any proof of service, request for extension of the deadline for service, or any other document that indicates his inte nt to prosecute this action. Therefore, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE on or before June 26, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to effectuate service of process. Plaintiff may discharge this order by filing executed proofs of service or requesting an extension of the deadline for good cause. (Attachments: # 1 CV-009) (mkr)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No. 8:17-cv-00689 JVS(SK)
Title

Date

May 25, 2017

Craig Anderson v. Nancy Berryhill

Present: The Honorable

Steve Kim, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Marc Krause

n/a

Deputy Clerk

Court Smart / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff:

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

None present

None present

Proceedings:

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: PROOF OF
SERVICE

On April 17, 2017, the Clerk of Court issued a Summons and advised Plaintiff that the
Summons and Complaint must be promptly served upon Defendant in accordance with Rule
4(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Further, Plaintiff was to file an appropriate proof of
service within 30 days of the date of the Order re: Procedures in Social Security Appeal (Joint
Submission Format). (ECF No. 6).
As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not filed any proof of service, request for
extension of the deadline for service, or any other document that indicates his intent to
prosecute this action. Therefore, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE on or before June
26, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to
effectuate service of process. Plaintiff may discharge this order by filing executed proofs of
service or requesting an extension of the deadline for good cause.
Plaintiff is advised that failure to file a timely response to this order will
result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute
and obey court orders. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Civil Rule 41-1. If Plaintiff no
longer wishes to pursue this action, Plaintiff may voluntarily dismiss the action pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) by filing a “Notice of Dismissal.” The Clerk is directed to
attach a Notice of Dismissal Form (CV-009) to this Order.

CV-90 (10/08)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Page 1 of 1