Niche Marketing, Inc. v. Jeffrey D. Lenney et al

Filing 21

CONSENT DECREE AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court ORDERS as follows: This Court has jurisdiction over the parties to this action and over the subject matter hereof pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a); The Court finds th ere is no just reason for delay in entering this Injunction and, pursuant to Rule 54(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court directs immediate entry of this Injunction against Defendants; and The Court shall retain jurisdiction over Def endants and of this action to entertain such further proceedings and to enter such further orders as may be necessary or appropriate to implement and enforce the provisions of this Injunction or of the parties' Settlement Agreement and General Release dated July 25, 2017. See document for further information. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (lwag)

JS-6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

NICHE MARKETING, INC., a
Canadian corporation,

13

Plaintiff,

14
15
16
17
18
19
20

CASE NO.: 8:17-cv-00722-JLS-JCG
CONSENT DECREE AND
PERMANENT INJUNCTION

vs.
JEFFREY D. LENNEY, an
individual; and JLENNEY
MARKETING, LLC, a California
limited liability company,
Defendants.
The Court, having read and considered the Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent

21 Decree and Permanent Injunction that has been executed by Plaintiff Niche Marketing,
22 Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Jeffrey D. Lenney and JLenney Marketing, LLC
23 ("Defendants") in this action, and good cause appearing therefore, hereby:
24

ORDERS that based on the Parties’ Stipulation and as to Defendants, their

25 successors, heirs, and assignees, this Consent Decree and Permanent Injunction
26 (“Injunction”) shall be and is hereby entered in the within action as follows:
27

1) This Court has jurisdiction over the parties to this action and over the subject

28 matter hereof pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a).
1

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

2) As part of this action, Plaintiff alleges that Defendants published false and
disparaging statements about Plaintiff's business practices, in order to falsely advertise
and generate business for Defendants.
3) Defendants and their agents, employees, representatives, successors and assigns
are hereby restrained and permanently enjoined from publishing in any public forum any
statement about Plaintiff or Plaintiff's affiliate marketing network Wealthy Affiliate
(“W.A.”) without Plaintiff's express written permission.
4) The Court finds there is no just reason for delay in entering this Injunction and,
pursuant to Rule 54(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court directs
immediate entry of this Injunction against Defendants.
5) The Court shall retain jurisdiction over Defendants and of this action to
entertain such further proceedings and to enter such further orders as may be necessary or
appropriate to implement and enforce the provisions of this Injunction or of the parties’
Settlement Agreement and General Release dated July 25, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

17
18
19
20

DATED: August 11, 2017
By: __________________________
Hon. Josephine L. Staton
United Stated District Judge

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2