Ivin Mood v. County of Orange et al
Filing
94
JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT COUNTY OF ORANGE by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, in favor of County of Orange against Ivin Mood. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be entered in favor of Defendant COUNTY OF ORANGE and against Plaintiff IVIN MOOD, that Plaintiff IVIN MOOD take nothing, that the action be dismissed on the merits with prejudice, and that Defendant COUNTY OF ORANGE is the prevailing party under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(1) and is entitled to recover its costs incurred in this action in accordance with said Rule and Local Rules of this Court. This Judgment may be amended to include any costs and other litigation expenses awarded to Defendant COUNTY OF ORANGE by the Court. (mrgo)
1
2
3
4
5
6
William L. Haluck, Es (SBN 80146
Zachary Schwartz, Es ~(SBN 28649)
Greg K. Koeller, Esq.~(SBN 312470)
Koeller, Nebeker, Carlson & Haluck, LLP
3 Park Plaza, Suite 1500
Irvine, CA 92614-8558
949-864-3400• fax: 949-864-9000
Email: bill.ha~uck(a,knchlaw.com /
zacharv.sc wartz a5 nc aw.com
F,~E~—
~-ERK, U.S. DIS'I R1^T GpURT
~Il~ 3 0 2019
ceNrwwo, r ~c of
BY
ALIFORIWA
DEPUi1'
Attorneys for Defendant
COUNTY OF ORANGE
7
S
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA -SANTA ANA
10
11
Case No.: 8:17-cv-00762-SVW-KK
Assigned to: Hon. Stephen V. Wilson
Crt. Rm: l0A
Magistrate Judg : Kenly Kiya Kato
IVIN MOOD
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
COUNTY OF ORANGE,DOES 1-10,
15
]JUDGMENT IN
[
FAVOR OF DEFENDANT
COUNTY OF ORANGE
Defendants.
16
Action Date:
Trial Date:
4/28/17
vacated
17
18
Defendant COUNTY OF ORANGE filed a Motion for Summary Judgment
19
and this Court originally denied the Motion. (See Doc. 73.) However, the Court
20
having reconsidered its position as to whether summary judgment is warranted in
21
favor of COUNTY OF ORANGE,the Court informed parties that it was inclined to
22
grant summary judgment sua sponte for COUNTY OF ORANGE and gave Plaintiff
23
IVIN MOOD an opportunity to file a brief in opposition. (Doc. 80.) After IVIN
24
MOOD filed an opposition (Doc. 81) and COUNTY OF ORANGE filed a reply
25 (
Doc. 84), this Court notified the parties on May 10, 2019 that the Court grants
2
6
summary judgment for COUNTY OF ORANGE (Doc. 86), and on July 25, 2019,
27
the Court issued its written order granting summary judgment sua sponte for
28
1
004.548:372221v1
Case No. 8:17-cv-00762-SVW-KK
[
PROPOSED]NDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT COUNTY OF ORANGE
1
COUNTY OF ORANGE.(Doc. 92.)
2
After reviewing all papers filed in support of summary judgment, as well as
3
all papers filed in opposition, and the issues have been duly heard and a decision
4
duly rendered, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be entered in
5
favor of Defendant COUNTY OF ORANGE and against Plaintiff IVIN MOOD,
6
that Plaintiff IVIN MOOD take nothing, that the action be dismissed on the merits
7
with prejudice, and that Defendant COUNTY OF ORANGE is the prevailing party
8
under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(1) and is entitled to recover its costs
9
incurred in this action in accordance with said Rule and Local Rules of this Court.
10
This Judgment may be amended to include any costs and other litigation expenses
11
awarded to Defendant COUNTY OF ORANGE by the Court.
12
IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.
13
14
DATED: 71.3
15
The Honorable Stephen V. Wilson
Judge ofthe United States District Court
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2
4
25
2
6
27
28
2
004.548:372221v1
II
Case No. 8:17-cv-00762-SVW-KK
[PROPOSED] NDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT COUNTY OF ORANGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?