Ivin Mood v. County of Orange et al

Filing 94

JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT COUNTY OF ORANGE by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, in favor of County of Orange against Ivin Mood. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be entered in favor of Defendant COUNTY OF ORANGE and against Plaintiff IVIN MOOD, that Plaintiff IVIN MOOD take nothing, that the action be dismissed on the merits with prejudice, and that Defendant COUNTY OF ORANGE is the prevailing party under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(1) and is entitled to recover its costs incurred in this action in accordance with said Rule and Local Rules of this Court. This Judgment may be amended to include any costs and other litigation expenses awarded to Defendant COUNTY OF ORANGE by the Court. (mrgo)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 William L. Haluck, Es (SBN 80146 Zachary Schwartz, Es ~(SBN 28649) Greg K. Koeller, Esq.~(SBN 312470) Koeller, Nebeker, Carlson & Haluck, LLP 3 Park Plaza, Suite 1500 Irvine, CA 92614-8558 949-864-3400• fax: 949-864-9000 Email: bill.ha~uck(a,knchlaw.com / zacharv.sc wartz a5 nc aw.com F,~E~— ~-ERK, U.S. DIS'I R1^T GpURT ~Il~ 3 0 2019 ceNrwwo, r ~c of BY ALIFORIWA DEPUi1' Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF ORANGE 7 S UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA -SANTA ANA 10 11 Case No.: 8:17-cv-00762-SVW-KK Assigned to: Hon. Stephen V. Wilson Crt. Rm: l0A Magistrate Judg : Kenly Kiya Kato IVIN MOOD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 COUNTY OF ORANGE,DOES 1-10, 15 ]JUDGMENT IN [ FAVOR OF DEFENDANT COUNTY OF ORANGE Defendants. 16 Action Date: Trial Date: 4/28/17 vacated 17 18 Defendant COUNTY OF ORANGE filed a Motion for Summary Judgment 19 and this Court originally denied the Motion. (See Doc. 73.) However, the Court 20 having reconsidered its position as to whether summary judgment is warranted in 21 favor of COUNTY OF ORANGE,the Court informed parties that it was inclined to 22 grant summary judgment sua sponte for COUNTY OF ORANGE and gave Plaintiff 23 IVIN MOOD an opportunity to file a brief in opposition. (Doc. 80.) After IVIN 24 MOOD filed an opposition (Doc. 81) and COUNTY OF ORANGE filed a reply 25 ( Doc. 84), this Court notified the parties on May 10, 2019 that the Court grants 2 6 summary judgment for COUNTY OF ORANGE (Doc. 86), and on July 25, 2019, 27 the Court issued its written order granting summary judgment sua sponte for 28 1 004.548:372221v1 Case No. 8:17-cv-00762-SVW-KK [ PROPOSED]NDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT COUNTY OF ORANGE 1 COUNTY OF ORANGE.(Doc. 92.) 2 After reviewing all papers filed in support of summary judgment, as well as 3 all papers filed in opposition, and the issues have been duly heard and a decision 4 duly rendered, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be entered in 5 favor of Defendant COUNTY OF ORANGE and against Plaintiff IVIN MOOD, 6 that Plaintiff IVIN MOOD take nothing, that the action be dismissed on the merits 7 with prejudice, and that Defendant COUNTY OF ORANGE is the prevailing party 8 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(1) and is entitled to recover its costs 9 incurred in this action in accordance with said Rule and Local Rules of this Court. 10 This Judgment may be amended to include any costs and other litigation expenses 11 awarded to Defendant COUNTY OF ORANGE by the Court. 12 IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED. 13 14 DATED: 71.3 15 The Honorable Stephen V. Wilson Judge ofthe United States District Court 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2 4 25 2 6 27 28 2 004.548:372221v1 II Case No. 8:17-cv-00762-SVW-KK [PROPOSED] NDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT COUNTY OF ORANGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?