Hung Le Doan v. John F. Kelly et al

Filing 13

*STRICKEN PER DOCUMENT # 14*** MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order Extending Time to Respond to Order to Show Cause and Continuing Hearing on Order to Show Cause by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott.As of the date of this Order, Respondents have filed neither a Motion to Dismiss nor an Answer to the Petition. On or before July 17, 2017, Respondent is hereby ordered to either (1) file an Answer to the Petition or (2) show cause why he failed to meet the June 21, 2017 deadline. If Petitioner has not yet been removed, Respondent should include a status update as to the progress of his removal. (dro) Modified on 6/26/2017 (dv).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. 8:17-cv-00779-KES

Date: June 26, 2017

Title: HUNG LE DOAN v. JOHN F. KELLY, ET AL
PRESENT:
THE HONORABLE KAREN E. SCOTT, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Denise Vo
Courtroom Clerk

Not Present
Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR
PLAINTIFF:
None Present

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR
DEFENDANT:
None Present

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS):

Order to show cause why Respondent has
failed to file a Response to Petition

On May 2, 2017, Petitioner, who is represented by counsel, filed a Petition for Writ of
Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Dkt. 1.) On May
5, 2017, the Court issued an Order Requiring Response to the Petition. (Dkt. 5.) Respondents
were directed to either (1) file a Motion to Dismiss within thirty (30) days of the date of the
Order, or (2) file an Answer to the Petition within forty-five (45) days of the date of the Order.
(Dkt. 5 at 2.)
On June 5, 2017, Respondents filed a stipulation for an extension of time to file an
Answer to the Petition. (Dkt. 7.) Respondents claimed that they had recently been informed that
ICE had arranged for Petitioner’s removal from the United States “in the first half of June,
2017.” (Id. at 2.) The Court extended Respondent’s deadline to file an Answer to June 21, 2017.
(Dkt. 8.)
As of the date of this Order, Respondents have filed neither a Motion to Dismiss nor an
Answer to the Petition. On or before July 17, 2017, Respondent is hereby ordered to either (1)
file an Answer to the Petition or (2) show cause why he failed to meet the June 21, 2017
deadline. If Petitioner has not yet been removed, Respondent should include a status update as to
the progress of his removal.
Initials of Deputy Clerk DV