William Lawrence McGrann v. City of Seal Beach et al

Filing 71

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver re Stipulation for Protective Order 70 . (see order for details) (hr)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 MARK D. RUTTER – State Bar No. 058194 DANIELLE C. FOSTER – State Bar No. 281385 CARPENTER, ROTHANS & DUMONT 500 S. Grand Avenue, 19th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 (213) 228-0400 / (213) 228-0401 (fax) mrutter@crdlaw.com / dfoster@crdlaw.com Attorneys for Defendants City of Seal Beach, a public agency, Corporal Brian Gray, and Todd DeVoe, public employees GABRIEL H. AVINA – State Bar No. 216099 LAW OFFICES OF GABRIEL H. AVINA 3781 Cimarron Street Los Angeles, CA 90018 (323) 299-1664 / (323) 315-5227 (fax) gabriel@avinalaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff William L. McGrann 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 William L. McGrann ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) CITY OF SEAL BEACH, JOE ) STILINOVICH CHIEF, individually, ) as a peace officer, and a final ) policymaker, BRIAN GRAY#365, ) individually and as a peace officer, ) TODD DEVOE#333, individually and ) as a police employee, DOES 1-10, ) inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) Case No.: SA CV17-941-VBF-RAOx STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER1 Hon. Rozella A. Oliver U.S. Magistrate Judge IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and among the parties hereto, through 24 25 their respective counsel of record as follows: 26 /// 27 1 28 This Stipulated Protective Order is substantially based on the model protective order provided under Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver’s Procedures. 1 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2 A. Purpose This civil litigation is based, in part, on allegations that Plaintiff William 3 McGrann was falsely arrested by the Seal Beach Police Department on July 9, 4 2012, and thereafter maliciously prosecuted for violating various provisions of the 5 California Penal Code, in People v. William McGrann, Orange County Superior 6 Court Case No. 13WM04856. Throughout the course of the criminal case in 7 People v. William McGrann, Mr. McGrann’s criminal defense attorney sought 8 discovery of confidential personnel records of Seal Beach Police Department 9 Officer Brian Gray and Emergency Services Coordinator Todd DeVoe, through the 10 procedures established under California Penal Code § 1054, et seq., or what is 11 commonly referred to as Pitchess motions. After in camera reviews were 12 conducted, the criminal court judge ordered the Seal Beach Police Department to 13 make three separate productions of the following confidential records and 14 information: 15 1. (Bates Stamp Nos. SBPD 001 – SBPD 093); 16 17 Seal Beach Police Department Internal Affairs Investigation No. 12-4 2. City of Seal Beach Notice of Intent to Terminate dated November 13, 18 2013 (Bates Stamp Nos. PLTF 000255 – PLTF 000266), which was 19 redacted by the criminal court; and 20 3. The information contained within a letter addressed to Jared 21 Stephenson dated September 18, 2014 (Bates Stamp No. PLTF 22 000267). 23 These confidential documents were produced pursuant to protective orders 24 issued by the criminal court, which provided that the documents could only be 25 used for the defense in People v. William McGrann. Because these confidential 26 documents have relevance to the instant civil litigation, the parties now seek and 27 hereby stipulate to have these documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as 28 “Protected Documents”) protected by the instant Stipulated Protective Order. 2 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 B. Good Cause Statement The Protected Documents warrant special protection from public disclosure 2 3 and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action. Specifically, 4 the Protected Documents are confidential personnel records protected by the right 5 to privacy under the California and U.S. Constitutions, the official information 6 privilege, the deliberative process privilege, the law enforcement privilege, as well 7 as California Evidence Code §§ 1043 through 1045 and California Penal Code § 8 832.5, et seq. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the 9 prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to 10 adequately protect information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to 11 ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in 12 preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of 13 the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information 14 is justified in this matter. 15 C. Scope The protections conferred by this Stipulated Protective Order cover not only 16 17 the Protected Documents, but also: (1) any information copied or extracted from 18 the Protected Documents; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of 19 the Protected Documents; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations 20 by parties or their counsel that might reveal the information contained in the 21 Protected Documents. Any use of the Protected Documents at trial shall be 22 governed by the orders of the trial judge. This Stipulated Protective Order does 23 not govern the use of the Protected Documents at trial. 24 D. Designating Protected Documents 25 The Protected Documents covered by this Stipulated Protective Order have 26 been clearly designated and bear the notation of “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT 27 TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” on the bottom of each page. 28 /// 3 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 E. Access To And Use Of Protected Documents The Protected Documents may only be used for purposes of prosecuting, 2 3 defending, or attempting to settle this civil action. The Protected Documents and 4 all information contained therein, may only be disclosed to the following persons: 5 1. Counsel of record for the parties to this civil litigation; 6 2. Paralegal, clerical, and secretarial personnel regularly employed by 7 counsel of record for the parties to this civil litigation; 3. 8 Investigators, expert witnesses, and other persons legitimately 9 involved in litigation-related activities for the counsel of record for the parties to 10 this civil litigation, who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be 11 Bound” (Exhibit A); 4. 12 13 Plaintiff William McGrann and Defendant City of Seal Beach and its employees, including, but not limited to Officer Brian Gray and Todd DeVoe; 14 5. The court and its personnel; 15 6. Court reporters and their staff; 16 7. During their depositions, witnesses, and attorneys for witnesses to 17 whom disclosure is reasonably necessary provided: (a) the deposing party requests 18 that the witness sign the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” form 19 (Exhibit A); and (b) they will not be permitted to keep any confidential 20 information unless they sign the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” 21 form (Exhibit A), unless otherwise agreed by the parties or ordered by the Court. 22 Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal the 23 Protected Documents, or any information contained therein, may be separately 24 bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as 25 permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order; and 8. 26 Any mediator or settlement officer, and their supporting personnel, 27 mutually agreed upon by the parties. 28 /// 4 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 F. Protected Documents Subpoenaed Or Ordered Produced In Other 2 Litigation 3 If a party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation 4 that compels disclosure of the Protected Documents, that party must: (1) promptly 5 notify in writing the City of Seal Beach and include a copy of the subpoena or 6 court order; (2) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or 7 order to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the 8 subpoena or order is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order and include a copy 9 of this Stipulated Protective Order; and (3) cooperate with respect to all reasonable 10 procedures sought to be pursued by the City of Seal Beach whose Protected 11 Documents may be affected. 12 If the City of Seal Beach timely seeks a protective order, the party served 13 with the subpoena or court order shall not produce the Protected Documents, or 14 any information contained therein, before a determination by the court from which 15 the subpoena or order issued, unless the party has obtained the City of Seal 16 Beach’s permission. The City of Seal Beach shall bear the burden and expense of 17 seeking protection in that court of its Protected Documents and nothing in this 18 Stipulated Protective Order should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a 19 party to disobey a lawful directive from another court. 20 G. 21 Unauthorized Disclosure Of Protected Documents If plaintiff learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, he has disclosed the 22 Protected Documents to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under 23 this Stipulated Protective Order, plaintiff must immediately: (1) notify in writing 24 the City of Seal Beach of the unauthorized disclosures; (2) use his best efforts to 25 retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected Documents; (3) inform the person 26 or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this 27 Stipulated Protective Order; and (4) request such person or persons to execute the 28 “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit 5 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 A. 2 H. Acknowledgment of Procedure For Filing Under Seal 3 The parties acknowledge that this Stipulated Protective Order does not 4 entitle them to file the Protected Documents under seal. Local Civil Rule 79-5 sets 5 forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied 6 when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 7 There is a strong presumption that the public has a right of access to judicial 8 proceedings and records in civil cases. In connection with non-dispositive 9 motions, good cause must be shown to support a filing under seal. See Kamakana 10 v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006); Phillips v. 11 Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002); Makar-Welbon v. 12 Sony Electrics, Inc., 187 F.R.D. 576, 577 (E.D. Wis. 1999) (even stipulated 13 protective orders require good cause showing). A specific showing of good cause 14 or compelling reasons with proper evidentiary support and legal justification, must 15 be made with respect to the Protected Documents a party seeks to file under seal. 16 The parties’ mere designation of the Protected Documents as 17 “CONFIDENTIAL” does not—without the submission of competent evidence by 18 declaration, establishing that the material sought to be filed under seal qualifies as 19 confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable—constitute good cause. Further, 20 if a party requests sealing related to a dispositive motion or trial, then compelling 21 reasons, not only good cause, for the sealing must be shown, and the relief sought 22 shall be narrowly tailored to serve the specific interest to be protected. See Pintos 23 v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-79 (9th Cir. 2010). For each item or 24 type of information, document, or thing sought to be filed or introduced under seal 25 in connection with a dispositive motion or trial, the party seeking protection must 26 articulate compelling reasons, supported by specific facts and legal justification, 27 for the requested sealing order. Again, competent evidence supporting the 28 application to file documents under seal must be provided by declaration. 6 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 Any document that is not confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable 2 in its entirety will not be filed under seal if the confidential portions can be 3 redacted. If documents can be redacted, then a redacted version for public 4 viewing, omitting only the confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable 5 portions of the document, shall be filed. Any application that seeks to file 6 documents under seal in their entirety should include an explanation of why 7 redaction is not feasible. 8 I. Duration And Trial Once this case proceeds to trial, if the Protected Documents are used or 9 10 introduced as exhibits at trial, they will become public and will be presumptively 11 available to all members of the public, including the press, unless compelling 12 reasons supported by specific factual findings to proceed otherwise are made to the 13 trial judge in advance of the trial. See Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1180-81 14 (distinguishing “good cause” showing for sealing documents produced in 15 discovery from “compelling reasons” standard when merits-related documents are 16 part of court record). Accordingly, the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order do 17 not extend beyond the commencement of the trial. 18 J. 19 20 21 Miscellaneous 1. Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Stipulated Protective Order abridges the right of any person to seek its modification by the Court in the future. 2. Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this 22 Protective Order, no party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to 23 disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in 24 this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no party waives any right to object on 25 any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective 26 Order. 27 28 3. The parties stipulate to the authenticity of the Protected Documents, but do not stipulate to their admissibility. 7 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 K. Final Disposition 2 After the final disposition of this action, within 60 days of a written request 3 by the City of Seal Beach, the plaintiff must return all Protected Documents to the 4 City of Seal Beach or destroy such material. As used in this subdivision, “all 5 Protected Documents” includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries, and 6 any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Documents. 7 Whether the Protected Documents are returned or destroyed, the plaintiff must 8 submit a written certification to the City of Seal Beach by the 60 day deadline that: 9 (1) identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Documents that 10 were returned or destroyed; and (2) affirms that the plaintiff has not retained any 11 copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries, or any other format reproducing or 12 capturing any of the Protected Documents. 13 L. Violation 14 Any violation of this Stipulated Protective Order may be punished by 15 appropriate measures including, without limitation, contempt proceedings and/or 16 monetary sanctions. 17 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 18 19 DATED: November 9, 2018 CARPENTER, ROTHANS & DUMONT /s/ Danielle Foster By: ___________________________________ MARK D. RUTTER DANIELLE C. FOSTER Attorneys for Defendants 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: November 9, 2018 LAW OFFICES OF GABRIEL H. AVINA /s/ Gabriel Avina By: ___________________________________ GABRIEL H. AVINA Attorney for Plaintiff 8 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 Local Rule 5-4.3.4 2 3 4 All signatories listed above, and on whose behalf this filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing. 5 6 7 8 ON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 11 12 DATED: November 13, 2018 ___________________________________ HONORABLE ROZELLA A. OLIVER United States Magistrate Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 9 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 EXHIBIT A 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND 3 I, _____________________________ [print or type full name], of 4 _____________________________ [print or type full address], declare under 5 penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated 6 Protective Order that was issued by the United States District Court for the Central 7 District of California on _________ [date] in the case of William McGrann v. City 8 of Seal Beach, et al., case no.: SA CV17-941-VBF-RAOx. 9 I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated 10 Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could 11 expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly 12 promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item that is 13 subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict 14 compliance with the provisions of this Order. 15 I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District 16 Court for the Central District of California for enforcing the terms of this 17 Stipulated Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after 18 termination of this action. 19 I hereby appoint __________________________ [print or type full name] of 20 _______________________________________ [print or type full address and 21 telephone number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with 22 this action or any proceedings related to enforcement of this Stipulated Protective 23 Order. 24 25 Date: ______________________________________ 26 City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________ 27 Printed name: _______________________________ 28 Signature: __________________________________ 10 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?