Young Hee Park v. Denver D Darling

Filing 21

ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge David O. Carter: On September 12, 2017, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause Why This Cause Should Not Be Dismissed for Lack of Prosecution (Order) (Dkt. 20). The deadline to respond to the Order was September 26, 2017. Id. Plaintiff has not responded to the Order in any fashion. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (es)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JS-6 CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL Case No. SA CV 17-1034-DOC (JDEx) Date: September 28, 2017 Title: YOUNG HEE PARK V. DENVER D DARLING PRESENT: THE HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER, JUDGE Deborah Goltz Courtroom Clerk Not Present Court Reporter ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT: None Present None Present PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION On September 12, 2017, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause Why This Cause Should Not Be Dismissed for Lack of Prosecution (“Order”) (Dkt. 20). The deadline to respond to the Order was September 26, 2017. Id. Plaintiff has not responded to the Order in any fashion. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Clerk shall serve this minute order on the parties. Initials of Deputy Clerk: djg MINUTES FORM 11 CIVIL-GEN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?