Young Hee Park v. Denver D Darling
Filing
21
ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge David O. Carter: On September 12, 2017, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause Why This Cause Should Not Be Dismissed for Lack of Prosecution (Order) (Dkt. 20). The deadline to respond to the Order was September 26, 2017. Id. Plaintiff has not responded to the Order in any fashion. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (es)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JS-6
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. SA CV 17-1034-DOC (JDEx)
Date: September 28, 2017
Title: YOUNG HEE PARK V. DENVER D DARLING
PRESENT:
THE HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER, JUDGE
Deborah Goltz
Courtroom Clerk
Not Present
Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR
PLAINTIFF:
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR
DEFENDANT:
None Present
None Present
PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR
LACK OF PROSECUTION
On September 12, 2017, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause Why This
Cause Should Not Be Dismissed for Lack of Prosecution (“Order”) (Dkt. 20). The
deadline to respond to the Order was September 26, 2017. Id. Plaintiff has not responded
to the Order in any fashion.
Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
The Clerk shall serve this minute order on the parties.
Initials of Deputy Clerk: djg
MINUTES FORM 11
CIVIL-GEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?