Mercury Cable and Energy, Inc. v. Jianzhong Zhong Huang et al

Filing 43

ORDER by Judge David O. Carter, GRANTING Joint Stipulation of Dismissal #42 . Pursuant to the Joint Stipulation submitted by Plaintiff Mercury Cable & Energy, Inc. and Jerome P. Fanucci, and good cause appearing therefor, the courtHEREBY ORDERS as follows: the within action against Jerome P. Fanucci shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, each party to bear its own costs and fees. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (es)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 JS-6 BRETT SCHUMAN (SBN 189247) bschuman@goodwinlaw.com GOODWIN PROCTER LLP Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111 Tel.: +1 415 733 6000 Fax.: +1 415 677 9041 Attorney for Defendant JEROME P. FANUCCI JAMES E. DOROSHOW (SBN 112920) jdoroshow@foxrothschild.com ASHE PURI (SBN 297814) apuri@foxrothschild.com FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP 1800 Century Park East, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Tel.: 310.598.4150 Fax: 310.556.9828 Attorneys for Plaintiff MERCURY CABLE & ENERGY, INC. 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SOUTHERN DIVISION 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MERCURY CABLE & ENERGY, INC., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff, v. JIANZHONG ZHONG HUANG a/k/a JASON HUANG, an individual; BORIS RYABOV, an individual; ALEX OKUN, an individual; J.D. SITTON, an individual; MICHAEL D. McINTOSH, an individual; DAVE BRYANT, an individual; CLEMENT HIEL, an individual; MARVIN SEPE, an individual; STEWART RAMSAY, an individual; GEORGE KORZENIOWSKI, an individual; DAVID F. DOCKERY, an individual; BRUCE S. BERNSTEIN, an individual; JEROME P. FANUCCI, an individual; BENTON H. WILCOXON, an individual; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. 8:17-cv-01048-DOC-E ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL [42] Courtroom: 9D Judge: Hon. David O. Carter Filed/Lodged Concurrently with: 1. Joint Stipulation of Dismissal 1 Pursuant to the Joint Stipulation submitted by Plaintiff Mercury Cable & 2 Energy, Inc. and Jerome P. Fanucci, and good cause appearing therefor, the court 3 HEREBY ORDERS as follows: 4 the within action against Jerome P. Fanucci shall be dismissed with 5 prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 6 each party to bear its own costs and fees. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 11 12 November 13, 2017 Dated: _________________ ________________ ___________________________ HON. David O. Carter U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?