Carlyne Jane P. Ada v. Federal Board of Investigations

Filing 6

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. It is Ordered that Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action without prejudice. (Attachments: # 1 Report and Recommendation) (sp)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

CARLYNE JANE P. ADA,

)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
)
FEDERAL BOARD OF
)
INVESTIGATIONS,
)
)
Respondent.
)
______________________________)

NO. SA CV 17-1137-JAK(E)

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

17
18

This Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Honorable

19

John A. Kronstadt, United States District Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

20

section 636 and General Order 05-07 of the United States District

21

Court for the Central District of California.

22
23

PROCEEDINGS

24
25

Carmelita P. Ada, assertedly on behalf of her high school student

26

daughter, Petitioner Carlyne Jane P. Ada, filed a “Petition for Writ

27

of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody” on July 3, 2017.

28

Court filed an “Order Dismissing Petition with Leave to Amend” on

The

1

July 7, 2017.

Therein, the Court allowed Petitioner thirty (30) days

2

from July 7, 2017, within which to file a First Amended Petition.

3

Court cautioned that: “[f]ailure to file a timely First Amended

4

Petition in conformity with this Order may result in the dismissal of

5

this action for failure to prosecute.”

6

Amended Petition has been filed.

The

Nevertheless, no timely First

7
8

DISCUSSION

9
10

The action should be dismissed without prejudice under the

11

Court’s inherent power to achieve the orderly and expeditious

12

disposition of cases by dismissing actions for failure to prosecute.

13

See Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30 (1962).

14

considered the factors recited in Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258,

15

1260-62 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 915 (1992), and has

16

concluded that dismissal without prejudice is appropriate.

17

particular, any less drastic alternative would not be effective under

18

the circumstances of this case.

The Court has

In

19
20

RECOMMENDATION

21
22

For all of the foregoing reasons, IT IS RECOMMENDED that the

23

Court issue an Order: (1) accepting and adopting this Report and

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
2

1

Recommendation; and (2) directing that Judgment be entered dismissing

2

the action without prejudice.

3
4

DATED: August 15, 2017.

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

/s/
CHARLES F. EICK
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1
2

NOTICE
Reports and Recommendations are not appealable to the Court of

3

Appeals, but may be subject to the right of any party to file

4

objections as provided in the Local Rules Governing the Duties of

5

Magistrate Judges and review by the District Judge whose initials

6

appear in the docket number.

7

Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure should be filed until entry of

8

the judgment of the District Court.

No notice of appeal pursuant to the

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4