D.C. G. et al v. City of Santa Ana et al
Filing
36
PROTECTIVE ORDER CONCERNING POLICE OFFICER PERSONNEL RECORDS by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi re Stipulation for Protective Order 34 . (kh)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
D.C.G., a Minor, by and through his
Guardian Ad Litem, Petra Gaeta; A.G.,
a Minor, by and through his Guardian
Ad Litem, Maria Rosas, individually
and as successors in interest to DAVID
GAETA, deceased; DAVID GAETA
URZUA, and PETRA GAETA,
individually,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
CITY OF SANTA ANA, an entity,
)
SAUL ESQUIVEL, DORIN
)
BUCHANAN; and DOES 1 through 10, )
Inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
Case No.: SACV17-01206 JVS (JCGx)
PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONCERNING POLICE OFFICER
PERSONNEL RECORDS
23
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, following stipulation of counsel, as follows:
24
1.
25
26
This lawsuit arises out of the officer-involved shooting of Decedent
David Gaeta on November 6, 2016.
2.
In discovery, the plaintiffs requested certain items that comprise the
27
confidential peace officer personnel files of Defendant Officers Saul Esquivel and
28
Dorin Buchanan and/or other items the City maintains are confidential. The City
-1PROTECTIVE ORDER CONCERNING
POLICE OFFICER PERSONNEL RECORDS
1
objected to production of these materials and the plaintiffs filed a motion to
2
compel. See Doc. 31. Thereafter, the Court issued an order directing the parties to
3
engage in further meet and confer efforts, among other things. See Doc. 33.
4
Pursuant to the Court’s order, the defendants are producing certain of items
5
requested by the plaintiffs (collectively defined in paragraph 1 as “Protected
6
Documents”).
7
3.
In light of the assertion of privilege and privacy by the defendants, the
8
following protective order shall govern production of documents collectively
9
defined in paragraph 1 as “Protected Documents”:
10
11
PROTECTIVE ORDER
The Protected Documents shall be subject to this Protective Order as
12
follows.
13
1.
All documents produced by the City of Santa Ana that compromise
14
the Protected Documents will be clearly designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” and be
15
placed in an envelope labeled as such prior to the disclosure. The
16
“CONFIDENTIAL” designation shall be placed on the printed pages of the
17
Protected Documents in a manner that does not overwrite or make illegible the text
18
of the document.
19
2.
Each person receiving any of the Protected Documents shall not
20
disclose to any person or entity, in any manner, including orally, any of the
21
Protected Documents or any of the information contained therein, except when
22
used for purposes of this litigation pursuant to this protective order.
23
24
3.
The Protected Documents and all information contained therein, may
only be disclosed to the following “qualified” persons:
25
(a)
Counsel of record for the parties to this civil litigation;
26
(b)
Defendant City of Santa Ana and its employees, including, but not
27
28
limited to Officers Saul Esquivel and Dorin Buchanan;
(c)
Paralegal, stenographic, clerical and secretarial personnel regularly
-2PROTECTIVE ORDER CONCERNING
POLICE OFFICER PERSONNEL RECORDS
1
employed by counsel referred to in subparagraph (a); and, investigators, expert
2
witnesses and other persons legitimately involved in litigation-related activities for
3
the counsel of record; and
4
5
6
(d)
Court personnel, including stenographic reporters engaged in such
proceedings as are necessarily incidental to preparation for the trial of this action.
(e)
With the exception of the Court and court personnel (who are subject
7
only to the Court’s internal procedures regarding the handling of material filed or
8
lodged, including material filed or lodged under seal), all persons receiving a copy
9
of the Protected Documents shall, before receiving such protected information, be
10
given a copy of this Protective Order and a compliance agreement (in the form
11
attached hereto as Exhibit “A”) and shall execute the compliance agreement, and
12
return the original of the compliance agreement to the attorney who gives him/her
13
the protected information. It shall be the responsibility of the respective attorneys
14
to distribute compliance agreements, and then collect and maintain custody of the
15
executed originals of the compliance agreements.
16
4.
The Protected Documents may be disclosed to the Court and court
17
personnel, in connection with this litigation. Portions of the Protected Documents
18
that a party intends to use in support of or in opposition to a pre-trial filing with the
19
Court must be filed in accordance with the Central District of California Local
20
Rules relating to under seal filings, including Local Rule 79-5. Counsel intending
21
to use documents from Protected Documents must both (a) apply to submit
22
unredacted documents containing any portion of the Protected Documents under
23
seal and (b) file public versions of the same documents with the information from
24
the Protected Documents redacted.
25
5.
In the event this matter proceeds to trial, to the extent that any of the
26
Protected Documents are offered into evidence, those documents will become
27
public, unless sufficient cause is shown in advance of trial to proceed otherwise.
28
6.
The court reporter, videographer, and audiographer, if any, who
-3PROTECTIVE ORDER CONCERNING
POLICE OFFICER PERSONNEL RECORDS
1
record all or part of any future deposition(s) in this matter, which include the
2
Protected Documents or descriptions thereof, shall be subject to this Order and
3
precluded from providing any portions of the original deposition videotape,
4
audiotape, or exhibits which relate to the Protected Documents or information to
5
any persons other than counsel of record, absent order of the court.
6
7.
Those attending any future deposition(s) shall be bound by this Order
7
and, therefore, shall not disclose to any person or entity, in any manner, including
8
orally, any documents from the Protected Documents made by such person during
9
the course of said depositions.
10
8.
At any future deposition(s), should there be persons in attendance
11
who are not authorized to access to the Protected Documents or information, such
12
persons shall be removed from the deposition room at any time information
13
relating to the Protected Documents or protected information is disclosed or
14
discussed.
15
9.
The Protected Documents shall be used solely in connection with the
16
preparation and trial of is action, entitled D.C.G., et al. v. City of Santa Ana, et al.,
17
bearing case number SACV17-1206 JVS (JCGx), or any related appellate
18
proceeding, and not for any other purpose, including, without limitation, any other
19
litigation or administrative proceedings or any investigation related thereto.
20
10.
This Order may not be modified unless by written consent of the
21
parties and approval of the Court. Any party may move for a modification of this
22
Order at any time. Upon receipt and review of the documents produced pursuant
23
to this protective order, any party may move to remove the confidential
24
designation of any document after meeting and conferring with opposing counsel
25
and pursuant to the procedures governing discovery motions set forth in Local
26
Rule 37.
27
28
11.
This Order is made for the purpose of ensuring that the Protected
Documents will remain confidential, unless otherwise ordered by the Court or in
-4PROTECTIVE ORDER CONCERNING
POLICE OFFICER PERSONNEL RECORDS
1
2
response to a successful motion by a party made pursuant to Paragraph 10.
12.
At the conclusion of this litigation, upon request of defense counsel,
3
plaintiffs’ counsel shall return the Protected Documents to Jill Williams, Esq.,
4
Carpenter, Rothans & Dumont, 500 S. Grand Avenue, 19th Floor, Los Angeles,
5
California 90071. Alternatively, the receiving parties and every other person
6
and/or entity who received originals or copies of the protected information may
7
destroy all such material and material derived therefrom within 30 calendar days
8
after the conclusion of this case. Additionally, within thirty 30 calendar days after
9
the conclusion of this case, counsel for the receiving parties shall send a signed
10
declaration stating that such material has been destroyed pursuant to this Protective
11
Order.
12
13
13.
Nothing in this Order shall be construed as authorizing a party to
disobey a lawful subpoena issued in another action.
14
15
GOOD CAUSE
The parties submit that GOOD CAUSE exists to enter the proposed
16
protective order to balance the defendants’ concerns that the documents consist of
17
confidential peace officer personnel records, the disclosure of which would violate
18
the right to privacy of police officers as protected by the official information
19
privilege, law enforcement privilege, the California and United States Constitution,
20
with plaintiffs’ right to discovery in this litigation. The parties agree that all
21
documents marked confidential and produced pursuant to this protective order are
22
subject to the terms of this protective unless otherwise ordered by the Court.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
26
DATED: April 02, 2018
___________________________________
Honorable Jay C. Gandhi
United States Magistrate Judge
27
28
-5PROTECTIVE ORDER CONCERNING
POLICE OFFICER PERSONNEL RECORDS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?