Belava, LLC v. Dion Nails Supply, Inc.

Filing 11

STIPULATED CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION by Judge Josephine L. Staton. DENIED BY ORDER OF THE COURT. Related to: Notice of Lodging 10 . (twdb) Modified on 8/28/2017 (twdb).

Download PDF
DENIED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 1 Defendant has not made an appearance in this action and, on the copy of the consent judgment signed by Ha Pham, Pham crossed out the title “Owner” and replaced it with “Manager.” (Doc. 10-1.) The Court, therefore, lacks sufficient proof that Defendant stipulated to the judgment. Date: August 28, 2017 Judge Josephine L. Staton 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 BELAVA, LLC, a California Limited 11 Liability Company, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 Case No.: 8:17-cv-01245-JLS-JDE STIPULATED CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION [PROPOSED] vs. 15 DION NAILS SUPPLY, INC. (d/b/a SKYLARK NAIL SUPPLY), a California 16 Corporation, 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 This Stipulated Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction (“Consent Judgment”) 21 is entered into by and between Plaintiff, Belava, LLC (“Belava”) and Defendant, Dion Nails 22 Supply, Inc. (d/b/a Skylark Nail Supply), subject to approval by the Court. 23 On July 20, 2017, Belava initiated this action against Defendant alleging 24 infringement of U.S. Patent No. D504,178 S. Belava makes and sells disposable lines for 25 tubs used during pedicures (“Belava Liners”). Belava also makes and sells the tubs for use 26 with the liners (“Belava Tubs”). The complaint arose from Defendant’s sale of disposable 27 liners for tubs used during pedicures (“Accused Liners”) and tubs (“Accused Tub”). 28 Defendant was served with the complaint in this Action on July 21, 2017. 1 1 The Defendant wishes to conclude this litigation with Belava without contesting the 2 Action, nor the validity or enforceability of the patent-in-suit. 3 Belava and the Defendant hereby agree to entry of this Consent Judgment. 4 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, ORDERED AND 5 ADJUDGED, 6 1. This is an action for patent infringement (35 U.S.C. § 101 et seq.). 7 2. With respect to the patent infringement claim, this Court has original and/or 8 exclusive jurisdiction over the subject matter and the Defendant under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 9 and 1338(a) and (b). Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). 10 3. Defendant admits that Belava is the owner of all right, title and interest in and 11 to the patent-in-suit. 12 4. Defendant does not contest that the patent-in-suit is valid and enforceable. 13 5. Defendant represents that it has ceased all sales of the Accused Liners and 14 Accused Tubs. 15 6. Effective as of the date this Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction is 16 entered by the Court, the Defendant and its affiliates and their respective agents, 17 representatives, subsidiaries, directors, principals, officers, successors, assigns, and all 18 others acting in concert or participation with them, and each of them, are hereby 19 permanently enjoined and restrained from importing into the United States, making, using, 20 offering to sell and selling the Accused Liners and the Accused Tubs, as well as any product 21 that is a colorable imitation of those products or the Belava Liner or Belava Tub. 22 7. The Parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. 23 8. This Consent Judgment constitutes a final judgment concerning the subject 24 matter of this action. 25 10. The Parties waive any right to appeal from this Consent Judgment and 26 Permanent Injunction. 27 11. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms and provisions of this 28 Consent Judgment and the Permanent Injunction stipulated to herein. 2 1 2 SO STIPULATED AND CONSENTED: 3 4 Dated: FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERY LLP 5 By: Jon A. Birmingham Attorney for Plaintiff Belava, LLC 6 7 8 9 Dated: 10 11 12 By: Ha Pham Owner Dion Nails Supply, Inc. SO ORDERED DENIED 13 14 Dated: _____ BY ORDER OF THE COURT By: _____________________ 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?