Leticia Barron v. State of California et al

Filing 109

JUDGMENT UPON JURY VERDICT by Judge James V. Selna. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, the Court enters judgment in favor of Defendants Daniel Agee and the State of California (together Defendants) following a jury verdict on D ecember 18, 2018, in favor of Defendants on each of Plaintiff Leticia Barrons claims for relief. Defendants are the prevailing parties entitled to costs pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54, taxed in a sum to be determined.. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (yl)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 JS-6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Case No. 8:17-cv-1275 JVS (KESx) LETICIA BARRON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS JUDGMENT UPON JURY SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO MAURICIO BARRON, DECEASED, VERDICT Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA; DANIEL AGEE; AND DOES 1-10, INCLUSIVE, Courtroom: 10C Judge: The Honorable James V. Selna Trial Date: December 11, 2018 Defendants. 20 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, the Court enters judgment in 21 favor of Defendants Daniel Agee and the State of California (together Defendants) 22 following a jury verdict on December 18, 2018, in favor of Defendants on each of 23 Plaintiff Leticia Barron’s claims for relief. Defendants are the prevailing parties 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 entitled to costs pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54, taxed in a sum to be determined. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Date: January 02, 2019 _________________________________ Honorable James V. Selna United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?