Leticia Barron v. State of California et al
Filing
109
JUDGMENT UPON JURY VERDICT by Judge James V. Selna. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, the Court enters judgment in favor of Defendants Daniel Agee and the State of California (together Defendants) following a jury verdict on D ecember 18, 2018, in favor of Defendants on each of Plaintiff Leticia Barrons claims for relief. Defendants are the prevailing parties entitled to costs pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54, taxed in a sum to be determined.. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (yl)
1
2
3
4
5
6
JS-6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Case No. 8:17-cv-1275 JVS (KESx)
LETICIA BARRON,
INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
JUDGMENT UPON JURY
SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO
MAURICIO BARRON, DECEASED, VERDICT
Plaintiff,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA; DANIEL
AGEE; AND DOES 1-10,
INCLUSIVE,
Courtroom: 10C
Judge:
The Honorable James V.
Selna
Trial Date: December 11, 2018
Defendants.
20
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, the Court enters judgment in
21
favor of Defendants Daniel Agee and the State of California (together Defendants)
22
following a jury verdict on December 18, 2018, in favor of Defendants on each of
23
Plaintiff Leticia Barron’s claims for relief. Defendants are the prevailing parties
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
entitled to costs pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54, taxed in a sum to
be determined.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Date: January 02, 2019
_________________________________
Honorable James V. Selna
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?