Lily Aasland et al v. Orange County Batbusters et al

Filing 21

ORDER by Judge James V. Selna, Granting Plaintiffs' Request to Dismiss ADA Claim and Remand Matter to State Superior Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the matter is hereby REMANDED California Superior Court for adjudication of the Plaintiffs remaining state causes of action. Remanding case to Superior Court of California, County of Orange, Case number 30-2017-00931892 CU-CR-CJC. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (twdb)

1
2
3
4
5
6

JS-6

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

LILYAASLAND, a minor, by and through
11 Guardian Ad Litem, BETSY AASLAND,
Plaintiff,
12
13

vs.

14
15 ORANGE COUNTY BATBUSTERS, a
California non-profit corporation, doing
16 business as OC BATBUSTERS; MICHAEL
STITH, an individual; CLAY LARA, an
17 individual; CHRIS PORTESI, an individual;
TONY BRACAMONTE, an individual; and
18 DOES 1 to 100, Inclusive,
19

Defendants.

20
21 ____________________________________

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO.: 8:17-cv-01491-JVS-JDE

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
REQUEST TO DISMISS ADA CLAIM
AND REMAND MATTER TO STATE
SUPERIOR COURT

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LAW OFFICE OF
STEPHEN A. MADONI
A Professional Corporation

ORDER

1

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST TO DISMISS ADA CLAIM AND

2

REMAND MATTER TO STATE SUPERIOR COURT

3

At the April 2, 2018 Scheduling Conference, both parties appearing through counsel of

4 record, Plaintiffs’ counsel moved to dismiss the Plaintiffs’ second cause of action for
5 VIOLATION OF THE AMERICAN’S WITH DISABILITIES ACT without prejudice and
6 have the matter remanded to California Superior Court.
7

Having considered the arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, the

8 Court now rules as follows:
9

IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiffs’ motion to DISMISS the Second Cause of Action

10 for VIOLATION OF THE AMERICAN’S WITH DISABILITIES ACT without prejudice is
11 GRANTED;
12

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the matter is hereby REMANDED California

13 Superior Court for adjudication of the Plaintiffs’ remaining state causes of action.
14

SO ORDERED.

15
16 DATED: April 12, 2018
17
18
19

___________________________________

20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LAW OFFICE OF
STEPHEN A. MADONI
A Professional Corporation

-2-

ORDER