Robert Sanchez v. Chinese Acupuncture Clinic et al
Filing
17
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Accordingly, the Court orders Plaintiff show cause why the Court should not dismiss this matter and/or issue sanctions for the failure to file timely the referenced document. No later than December 5, 2017, counsel shall file the document and a separate written response explaining their disregard of the Court's Order. (see document for details). (dro)
____________________________________________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. 8:17-cv-01796-JLS-DFM
Title: Robert Sanchez v. Chinese Acupuncture Clinic, et al.
Date: November 28, 2017
Present: Honorable JOSEPHINE L. STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Terry Guerrero
Deputy Clerk
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF:
Not Present
N/A
Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:
Not Present
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
On October 18, 2017, the Court issued a Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access
Litigation that directed Plaintiff to serve three documents on the defendant(s) and file
with the Court a proof of service indicating that the Notice to Parties and the attached
Application for Stay and Early Mediation were served. (See Doc. 13). To date, the Court
has not received the proof of service.
Accordingly, the Court orders Plaintiff show cause why the Court should not
dismiss this matter and/or issue sanctions for the failure to file timely the referenced
document. No later than December 5, 2017, counsel shall file the document and a
separate written response explaining their disregard of the Court’s Order.
Initials of Preparer: tg
______________________________________________________________________________
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?