Denise Menichiello v. Jonathan Construction, Inc., et al

Filing 29

ORDER by Judge Josephine L. Staton that pursuant to the Joint Stipulation 27 , the entire case is dismissed with prejudice as to the Named Plaintiff and without prejudice as to the Putative Class. Each party shall bear their own costs and expenses. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

1

JS-6

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

DENISE MENICHIELLO, individually ) Case No. 8:17-cv-01867-JLS-DFM
and on behalf of all others similarly
)
situated,
) ORDER
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
JONATHAN CONSTRUCTION,
)
INC., and DOES 1 through 10,
)
inclusive, and
)
each of them,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

1
2

Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Stipulation (Doc. 27), the Declaration of
Todd M. Friedman (Doc. 27-1) and the Settlement Agreement (Doc. 28), the

3
4
5
6

Court finds that the Settlement Agreement and dismissal of the Named Plaintiff’s
claims do not raise concerns of prejudice to the putative class, as described in
Diaz v. Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, 876 F.2d 1401, 1408 (9th Cir.

7
8
9

1989).
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to the Joint

10
11
12

Stipulation, the entire case is dismissed with prejudice as to the Named Plaintiff
and without prejudice as to the Putative Class. Each party shall bear their own

13

costs and expenses.
14
15
16
17
18
19

Dated: January 24, 2019
_______________________________
The Honorable Josephine L. Staton

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2