Jose Valenzuela et al v. Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. et al

Filing 61

MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge James V. Selna: On May 6, 2019, Counsel filed a Notice of Settlement and Stipulate to Vacate Dates. The Court signed the parties order on May 8, 2019. To date, no further motions or settlement documents have been filed, and the Courtroom Deputy Clerk has emailed counsel numerous times as to the status of this case. The Court ORDERS plaintiff(s), to Show Cause (OSC) in writing no later than September 30, 2019 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (es)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.

SACV 17-01988JVS(DFMx)

Title

Jose Valenzuela, et al v Walt Disney Parks and Resorts US, Inc, et al

Present: The
Honorable

Date

September 19, 2019

James V. Selna, US District Court Judge
Lisa Bredahl

Not Present

Deputy Clerk

Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present

Not Present

Proceedings:

(In Chambers)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE
DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

On May 6, 2019, Counsel filed a Notice of Settlement and Stipulate to Vacate Dates.
The Court signed the parties order on May 8, 2019. To date, no further motions or
settlement documents have been filed, and the Courtroom Deputy Clerk has emailed counsel
numerous times as to the status of this case.
The Court ORDERS plaintiff(s), to Show Cause (OSC) in writing no later than
September 30, 2019 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As
an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will consider the filing of one
of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date:
X

Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement or other motion re
settlement, or a dismissal of this matter

Absent a showing of good cause, an action shall be dismissed if the summons and
complaint have not been served upon all defendants within 90 days after the filing of the
complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) The Court may dismiss the action prior to the expiration
of such time, however, if plaintiff(s) has/have not diligently prosecuted the action.
It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to respond promptly to all orders and to prosecute the
action diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time under
Rule 55 remedies promptly upon default of any defendant. All stipulations affecting the
progress of the case must be approved by the Court. Local Rule 7-1

CV-90 (06/04)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.

SACV 17-01988JVS(DFMx)

Date

Title

Jose Valenzuela, et al v Walt Disney Parks and Resorts US, Inc, et al
Initials of Preparer

CV-90 (06/04)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

September 19, 2019

lmb

Page 2 of 2