Paul Jackley v. General Motors Company et al

Filing 57

JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: 1. That judgment shall be entered in favor of General Motors against Plaintiff PAUL JACKLEY (Plaintiff) on all claims in Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 10); 2. Th at the case be dismissed with prejudice on the merits; 3. That Plaintiff recover nothing against General Motors; and 4. That General Motors will be awarded its costs of suit pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 54 and Local Rule 54-1. 55 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)

Download PDF
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - 11 SOUTHERN DIVISION 12 PAUL JACKLEY, Case No. 8:17-cv-02085-JVS-FFM 13 14 Plaintiff, JUDGMENT vs. 15 16 17 18 GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY; and DOES 1 through 50 inclusive, Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 8:17-cv-02085-JVS-FFM 1 JUDGMENT 1 On January 17, 2019, the Court heard argument on Defendant GENERAL 2 MOTORS LLC’s (“General Motors”) Motion for Summary Judgment, Or In The 3 Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment (“Motion”). In accordance with the Court’s 4 Order Granting Summary Judgment dated January 28, 2019 (ECF No. 55), IT IS 5 HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: 6 1. That judgment shall be entered in favor of General Motors against 7 Plaintiff PAUL JACKLEY (“Plaintiff”) on all claims in Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF 8 No. 10); 9 2. That the case be dismissed with prejudice on the merits; 10 3. That Plaintiff recover nothing against General Motors; and 11 4. That General Motors will be awarded its costs of suit pursuant to Federal 12 Rules of Civil Procedure 54 and Local Rule 54-1. 13 14 15 DATED: February 06, 2019 16 17 ____________________________ Honorable James V. Selna United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 8:17-cv-02085-JVS-FFM 2 JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?