Randall Aaron Morton v. Randall Stephenson et al

Filing 65

RULE 54(B) JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton, Accordingly, judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendant THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY and against Plaintiff. 47 (es)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SOUTHERN DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

RANDALL AARON MORTON,
v.

Plaintiff,

RANDELL STEPHENSON, AT&T, JEFF
BEWKES, TIME WARNER, ROBERT
IGER, THE WALT DISNEY
COMPANY, RUPERT MURDOCH,
21ST CENTURY FOX, and DOES 11,000,
Defendants.

Case No. 8:17-cv-2198-JLS-DFM
RULE 54(B) JUDGMENT

1

The Court dismissed Plaintiff’s Complaint on June 13, 2018 with leave to

2

amend within 21 days. Although Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint

3

(“SAC”) on July 3, 2018, the SAC did not set forth any claims against THE WALT

4

DISNEY COMPANY.

5

Because Plaintiff’s “allegations against AT&T (related to its merger with

6

Time Warner) were improperly joined with his allegations against Disney (related

7

to its potential merger with 21st Century Fox),” ECF 47 at 8, the Court determines

8

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) that there is no just reason for

9

delay in entering judgment for Defendant THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY.

10

Accordingly, judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendant THE WALT

11

DISNEY COMPANY and against Plaintiff.

12

IT IS SO ORDERED.

13

DATED: August 14, 2018
________________________
Hon. Josephine L. Staton
United States District Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 8:17-CV-2198