Estate of Michael Anthony Perez et al v. City of Orange et al

Filing 91

ORDER RE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge James V. Selna. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety as to all defendants, each side to bear its/his/her own fees and costs. 90 (es)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Attorneys for Plaintiffs, ESTATE OF MICHAEL ANTHONY PEREZ, ERIKA
EDITH PEREZ, Del.P., Da.P., Div.P., and D.M.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

THE ESTATE OF MICHAEL ANTHONY ) Case No.: 8:18-cv-00028-JVS-KES
PEREZ, and M.A.P., JESUZ RAMIREZ, )
) ORDER RE DISMISSAL WITH
MONIQUE PEREZ, ERIKA EDITH
PEREZ, Del. P., Da.P., Div.P., and D.M., ) PREJUDICE
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
v.
)
)
CITY OF ORANGE, THOMAS
)
KISELA, CARLOS GUTIERREZ, and
)
DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1
ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

Having reviewed the Stipulation of the Parties and good cause appear, IT IS

2

HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in

3

its entirety as to all defendants, each side to bear its/his/her own fees and costs.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6
7
8

Dated: August 8, 2019
______________________________
Hon. James V. Selna
Judge of the United States District Court

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER