Securities and Exchange Commission v. Daniel B Vazquez, Sr. et al

Filing 28

FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO HOPLON FINANCIAL GROUP by Judge Cormac J. Carney, in favor of Securities and Exchange Commission against Hoplon Financial Group. Related to: Order on Motion for Default Judgment 27 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DE CREED that Hoplon is liable for disgorgement of $252,447, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $45,069.83. Hoplon shall satisfy this obligation by paying $297,516.83 to SEC within 14 days after entry of this Final Judgment. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 13 Plaintiff, 14 15 16 17 vs. DANIEL B. VAZQUEZ, SR., GILBERT FLUETSCH, AND HOPLON FINANCIAL GROUP, Defendant. Case No. FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO HOPLON FINANCIAL GROUP Date: Time: Ctrm: Judge: August 13, 2018 1:30 p.m. 9B Hon. Cormac J. Carney 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JUDGMENT – HOPLON Case No. 1 FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT HOPLON FINANCIAL GROUP 2 This cause came before the Court upon Plaintiff Securities and Exchange 3 Commission’s (“SEC”) Motion for Entry of Default Judgments (“Motion”) against 4 Defendants Daniel B. Vazquez, Sr. and Hoplon Financial Group (“Hoplon”). The 5 Court, having considered the SEC’s Complaint, the Motion, the supporting 6 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, the supporting declarations and exhibits, and 7 the other evidence and argument presented to the Court, orders that: 8 9 I. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the SEC’s 10 Motion for Entry of Default Judgment Against Defendant Hoplon Financial Group is 11 GRANTED. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 II. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Hoplon is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also JUDGMENT – HOPLON 1 Case No. 1 binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal 2 service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and 3 attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or 4 with anyone described in (a). III. 5 6 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 7 Hoplon is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, 8 Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 9 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of 10 transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, 11 directly or indirectly: 12 (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; 13 (b) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a 14 material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the 15 statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, 16 not misleading; or 17 (c) 18 operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser. 19 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as 20 provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also 21 binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal 22 service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and 23 attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or 24 with anyone described in (a). to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which IV. 25 26 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 27 Hoplon is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, 28 Section 15(a) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78o(a)] by the use of any means or JUDGMENT – HOPLON 2 Case No. 1 instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of 2 the mails, to effect any transaction in, or induce or attempt to induce the purchase or 3 sale of, any security without being registered with the Commission or being 4 associated with a registered broker or dealer that is not a natural person. 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as 6 provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also 7 binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal 8 service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and 9 attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or 10 with anyone described in (a). V. 11 12 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Hoplon is 13 liable for disgorgement of $252,447, representing profits gained as a result of the 14 conduct alleged in the Complaint, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the 15 amount of $45,069.83. Hoplon shall satisfy this obligation by paying $297,516.83 to 16 the Securities and Exchange Commission within 14 days after entry of this Final 17 Judgment. 18 Hoplon may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will 19 provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request. Payment may also 20 be made directly from a bank account via Pay.gov through the SEC website at 21 http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm. Hoplon may also pay by certified check, 22 bank cashier’s check, or United States postal money order payable to the Securities 23 and Exchange Commission, which shall be delivered or mailed to: 24 25 26 Enterprise Services Center Accounts Receivable Branch 6500 South MacArthur Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73169 27 and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying the case title, civil action number, 28 and name of this Court; Hoplon Financial Group as a defendant in this action; and JUDGMENT – HOPLON 3 Case No. 1 specifying that payment is made pursuant to this Final Judgment. 2 Hoplon shall simultaneously transmit photocopies of evidence of payment and 3 case identifying information to the Commission’s counsel in this action. By making 4 this payment, Hoplon relinquishes all legal and equitable right, title, and interest in 5 such funds and no part of the funds shall be returned to Hoplon. The Commission 6 shall send the funds paid pursuant to this Final Judgment to the United States 7 Treasury. 8 The Commission may enforce the Court’s judgment for disgorgement and 9 prejudgment interest by moving for civil contempt (and/or through other collection 10 procedures authorized by law) at any time after 14 days following entry of this Final 11 Judgment. Hoplon shall pay post judgment interest on any delinquent amounts 12 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. VI. 13 14 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court 15 shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this 16 Final Judgment. 17 VII. 18 There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal 19 Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith 20 and without further notice. 21 22 Dated: August 7, 2018 _______________________ _ _ ____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE D JUDG 23 24 25 26 27 28 JUDGMENT – HOPLON 4 Case No.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?