Mustafa Suleiman v. Unum Group Corporation et al
Filing
27
ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE [FRPC 41(a)(1)] by Judge Andrew J. Guilford, Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed in its entirety with prejudice as to Defendant Unum Group, erroneously served as Unum group Corporation. Each party shall bear his or its own attorneys' fees and costs. 26 Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (es)
1
2
3
4
JS-6
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SOUTHERN DIVISION
10
11
MUSTAFA SULEIMAN, an individual,
12
13
Plaintiff,
vs.
UNUM GROUP CORPORATION, a
Delaware corporation; and DOES 1
15 through 20, inclusive,
14
16
17
18
Case No. 8:18-cv-00262-AG-JDE
Honorable Andrew J. Guilford
ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE
[FRPC 41(a)(1)]
Defendants.
Complaint Filed: January 2, 2018
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
ORDER
1
2
3
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed in
4
its entirety with prejudice as to Defendant Unum Group, erroneously served as Unum group
5
Corporation. Each party shall bear his or its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
10
Dated: April 11, 2019
HONORABLE ANDREW J. GUILFORD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?