Mustafa Suleiman v. Unum Group Corporation et al

Filing 27

ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE [FRPC 41(a)(1)] by Judge Andrew J. Guilford, Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed in its entirety with prejudice as to Defendant Unum Group, erroneously served as Unum group Corporation. Each party shall bear his or its own attorneys' fees and costs. 26 Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (es)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 JS-6 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SOUTHERN DIVISION 10 11 MUSTAFA SULEIMAN, an individual, 12 13 Plaintiff, vs. UNUM GROUP CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 15 through 20, inclusive, 14 16 17 18 Case No. 8:18-cv-00262-AG-JDE Honorable Andrew J. Guilford ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE [FRPC 41(a)(1)] Defendants. Complaint Filed: January 2, 2018 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE ORDER 1 2 3 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed in 4 its entirety with prejudice as to Defendant Unum Group, erroneously served as Unum group 5 Corporation. Each party shall bear his or its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 10 Dated: April 11, 2019 HONORABLE ANDREW J. GUILFORD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?