Pacific Contours Corporation v. Fives Machining System, Inc.
Filing
43
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, by Judge David O. Carter 34 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted; 2. The Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SOUTHERN DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
PACIFIC CONTOURS
CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
v.
FIVES MACHINING SYSTEMS,
INC., et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 8:18-cv-00413-DOC (JDEx)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATION OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
18
19
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the records on file,
20
including Complaint filed by Plaintiff Contours Corporation, the Motion for
21
Judgment on the Pleadings (Dkt. 18, “Motion”) filed by Defendant Fives
22
Machining Systems, Inc., the Opposition, Reply and Supplemental briefs in
23
support of and/or opposition to the Motion, the Report and Recommendation
24
of the assigned United States Magistrate Judge, as well as the Objections
25
thereto and Replies to Objections filed by the parties. Further, the Court has
26
engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and
27
Recommendation to which objections have been made.
28
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;
3
2.
The Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as
4
follows:
5
a. The Motion is DENIED as to Claim Three;
6
b. The Motion is GRANTED as to Claims Four and Five without
7
leave to amend and final judgment in this action shall reflect
8
that Claims Four and Five are dismissed.
9
10
Dated: November 28, 2018
11
______________________________
DAVID O. CARTER
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?