United States of America v. One 2013 Totoya Rav-4

Filing 22

CONSENT JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter. Each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. Related to: Stipulation 21 . (twdb)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SOUTHERN DIVISION 15 16 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 17 Plaintiff, 18 v. No. 5:18-CV-00613-DOC (KESx) 19 20 ONE 2013 TOYOTA RAV-4, Defendant. 21 22 AIMAN ALEXANDER ATABA, 23 Claimant. 24 25 26 27 28 CONSENT JUDGMENT [21] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Plaintiff and Claimant Aiman Alexander Ataba (“Ataba”) have made a stipulated request for the entry of this Consent Judgment, resolving this action in its entirety. The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, HEREBY ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES: 1. This Court has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action. 2. The government has given and published notice of this action as required by 8 law, including Supplemental Rule G for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset 9 Forfeiture Actions, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of this Court. 10 All potential claimants to the defendant One 2013 Toyota RAV-4 (“defendant vehicle”) 11 other than Ataba are deemed to have admitted the allegations of the Complaint. The 12 allegations set out in the Complaint are sufficient to establish a basis for forfeiture. 13 3. The United States of America shall sell the defendant vehicle in the same 14 manner in which it sells forfeited vehicles, and the funds generated by the sale shall be 15 distributed in the following order of priority: a. 16 First, to the United States for any and all of its costs and expenses 17 related to this seizure, including but not limited to towing, storage, maintenance and sale 18 of the defendant vehicle; and, b. 19 Second, to the extent there are any remaining funds, the United States 20 Marshal Service shall deliver a check in that amount to “The Clerk of the Court” to be 21 applied to the restitution ordered in the related criminal case, United States v. Aiman 22 Alexander Ataba, SA CR 17-0024-DOC, Docket 97. 23 4. Ataba shall execute further documents, to the extent necessary, to convey 24 clear title to the defendant vehicle to Plaintiff and to further implement the terms of this 25 Judgment. 26 27 28 5. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to resolve any issues with respect to either party’s obligations under this Judgment. 6. Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 2 1 7. The Court finds that there was reasonable cause for the seizure of the 2 defendant vehicle and institution of these proceedings. This consent judgment shall be 3 construed as a certificate of reasonable cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465. 4 5 Dated: September 5 , 2018 THE HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 Presented by: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 NICOLA T. HANNA United States Attorney LAWRENCE S. MIDDLETON Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division STEVEN R. WELK Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Asset Forfeiture Section /s/ KATHARINE SCHONBACHLER Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?