Linksmart Wireless Technology LLC v. Gogo Inc, et al
Filing
289
ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (DKT. 288 ); JS-6 by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Stipulation is APPROVED. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the following actions are DISMISSED in their entirety, wit h prejudice, with each party bearing its own costs and attorneys' fees: Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. Panasonic Avionics Corp., No. 8:18-cv-00662-JAK-JDE. Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. Emirates et al., No. 2:18-cv-03353-AG-JDE. L inksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. WestJet Airlines Ltd. et al., No. 8:18-cv-00657-AG-JDE. Pursuant to the Stipulation, Plaintiff may not pursue claims for infringement relating to Panasonic-supplied systems in the following cases: Linksmart Wirele ss Technology, LLC v. Grupo Aeromexico S.A.B. de C.V. et al., No. 2:18-cv-03335-AG-JDE. Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. Air France-KLM SA, No. 2:18-cv-03341-AG-JDE. Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. American Airlines Group, Inc., No. 2:18-cv-03349-AG-JDE. Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. Southwest Airlines Co., No. 8:18-cv-00660-AG-JDE. Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. United Continental Holdings, Inc. et al., No. 2:18-cv-03348-AG-JDE. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
Case 8:18-cv-00654-JAK-JDE Document 289 Filed 08/30/21 Page 1 of 3 Page ID #:11608
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LINKSMART WIRELESS
TECHNOLOGY, LLC
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
vs.
GOGO LLC
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LINKSMART WIRELESS
TECHNOLOGY, LLC
Plaintiff,
vs.
PANASONIC AVIONICS CORP.
Defendant.
No. 8:18-cv-00654-JAK (JDEx) - LEAD
ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION
RE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
(DKT. 288)
JS-6
No. 8:18-cv-00662-JAK (JDEx) CONSOLIDATED
Case 8:18-cv-00654-JAK-JDE Document 289 Filed 08/30/21 Page 2 of 3 Page ID #:11609
1
Based on the parties’ Joint Stipulation Re Dismissal with Prejudice (the
2
“Stipulation” (Dkt. 288)), sufficient good cause has been shown for the requested
3
relief. Therefore, the Stipulation is APPROVED.
4
5
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the following
6
actions are DISMISSED in their entirety, with prejudice, with each party bearing its
7
own costs and attorneys’ fees:
8
9
10
11
12
13
• Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. Panasonic Avionics Corp., No. 8:18cv-00662-JAK-JDE
• Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. Emirates et al., No. 2:18-cv-03353AG-JDE
• Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. WestJet Airlines Ltd. et al., No. 8:18cv-00657-AG-JDE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Pursuant to the Stipulation, Plaintiff may not pursue claims for infringement
relating to Panasonic-supplied systems in the following cases:
• Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. Grupo Aeromexico S.A.B. de C.V. et
al., No. 2:18-cv-03335-AG-JDE
• Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. Air France-KLM SA, No. 2:18-cv03341-AG-JDE
• Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. American Airlines Group, Inc., No.
2:18-cv-03349-AG-JDE
• Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. Southwest Airlines Co., No. 8:18cv-00660-AG-JDE
• Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. United Continental Holdings, Inc. et
al., No. 2:18-cv-03348-AG-JDE
Case 8:18-cv-00654-JAK-JDE Document 289 Filed 08/30/21 Page 3 of 3 Page ID #:11610
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
August 30, 2021
Date: _____________________
______________________
John A. Kronstadt
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?