Michael E. Berry v. Equifax Inc., et al
Filing
14
ORDER REGARDING JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING REMAND 12 by Judge Josephine L. Staton. The Court hereby remands the above-entitled action to the Superior Court of California, County of Orange, Case No. 30-02018-00978682-CU-BT-CJC. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (es)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
10
11
12
13
14
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL E. BERRY, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
EQUIFAX INC.
Case No. 8:18-cv-00957-JLS-PJW
ORDER REGARDING JOINT
STIPULATION REGARDING
REMAND
15
16
Defendant.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
ORDER REGARDING JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING REMAND
CASE NO. 8:18-CV-00957-JLS-PJW
1
The Court, having considered Defendant Equifax Inc.’s (“Equifax”) and
2
Plaintiffs’ (collectively, “the Parties”) August 24, 2018 Joint Stipulation Regarding
3
Remand, hereby GRANTS the Parties’ Joint Stipulation.
4
5
The Court hereby remands the above-entitled action to the Superior Court of
California, County of Orange, Case No. 30-02018-00978682-CU-BT-CJC.
6
7
SO ORDERED, this 29th day of August, 2018.
8
9
10
JOSEPHINE L. STATON
______________________________
HON. JOSEPHINE L. STATON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
ORDER REGARDING JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING REMAND
CASE NO. 8:18-CV-00957-JLS-PJW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?