Michael E. Berry v. Equifax Inc., et al

Filing 14

ORDER REGARDING JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING REMAND 12 by Judge Josephine L. Staton. The Court hereby remands the above-entitled action to the Superior Court of California, County of Orange, Case No. 30-02018-00978682-CU-BT-CJC. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (es)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 10 11 12 13 14 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL E. BERRY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EQUIFAX INC. Case No. 8:18-cv-00957-JLS-PJW ORDER REGARDING JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING REMAND 15 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 ORDER REGARDING JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING REMAND CASE NO. 8:18-CV-00957-JLS-PJW 1 The Court, having considered Defendant Equifax Inc.’s (“Equifax”) and 2 Plaintiffs’ (collectively, “the Parties”) August 24, 2018 Joint Stipulation Regarding 3 Remand, hereby GRANTS the Parties’ Joint Stipulation. 4 5 The Court hereby remands the above-entitled action to the Superior Court of California, County of Orange, Case No. 30-02018-00978682-CU-BT-CJC. 6 7 SO ORDERED, this 29th day of August, 2018. 8 9 10 JOSEPHINE L. STATON ______________________________ HON. JOSEPHINE L. STATON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 ORDER REGARDING JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING REMAND CASE NO. 8:18-CV-00957-JLS-PJW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?