Albert Hur v. Hyesung Park et al

Filing 34

MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge James V. Selna: On October 1, 2019 the plaintiff lodged with the Court "Plaintiff's Request for Additional Time to Properly Effectuate Service of Process" and the clerk's office forwarded to the court a Notice of Document Discrepancies with the request. The Court ordered that the document not be filed but instead rejected and ordered returned to counsel on October 3, 2019. The Court orders this case DISMISSED. Case Terminated. (See document for further details.) Made JS-6. (es)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. SACV 18-01083JVS(DFMx) Title Albert Hur v Hyesung Park, et al Present: The Honorable Date October 8, 2019 James V. Selna, U.S. District Court Judge Lisa Bredahl Not Present Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present Proceedings: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER DISMISSING CASE On March 25, 2019, this Court granted plaintiff until July 1, 2019 to serve the defendant. On July 1, 2019, the plaintiff filed a request for additional time to properly effectuate service of process. On July 8, 2019 the Court granted plaintiff’s request and granted plaintiff until October 1, 2019 to serve the defendant and stated that “NO FURTHER CONTINUANCES WILL BE GRANTED.” On October 1, 2019 the plaintiff lodged with the Court “Plaintiff’s Request for Additional Time to Properly Effectuate Service of Process” and the clerk’s office forwarded to the court a Notice of Document Discrepancies with the request. The Court ordered that the document not be filed but instead rejected and ordered returned to counsel on October 3, 2019. The Court orders this case DISMISSED. : Initials of Preparer CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL 0 lmb Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?