Uniloc 2017 LLC et al v. Microsoft Corporation
Filing
36
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth re Stipulation for Protective Order 35 . (kh)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
M. ELIZABETH DAY (SBN
177125)
eday@feinday.com
DAVID ALBERTI (SBN 220265)
dalberti@feinday.com
SAL LIM (SBN 211836)
slim@feinday.com
MARC BELLOLI (SBN
244290)
mbelloli@feinday.com
FEINBERG DAY ALBERTI LIM
& BELLOLI LLP
1600 El Camino Real, Suite 280
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Tel: 650.618.4360
Fax: 650.618.4368
Attorneys for Uniloc 2017 LLC,
Uniloc Licensing USA LLC and
Uniloc USA, Inc.
15
UNILOC 2017 LLC, UNILOC
LICENSING USA LLC and
UNILOC USA, INC.,
20
21
22
23
24
Jesse Ashler Gessin (CA Bar No.
263889)
E-mail: jgessin@kelleranderle.com
Keller Anderle LLP
18300 Von Karman Ave., Suite 930
Irvine, California 92612
Attorneys for Defendant
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
19
Indranil Mukerji (Admitted Pro Hac
Vice)
E-mail: mukerji@fr.com
Fish & Richardson P.C.
1000 Maine Ave SW Suite 1000
Washington DC 20024
Telephone: (202) 783-5070
Facsimile: (202) 783-2331
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
18
Juanita R. Brooks (CA Bar No.75934)
E-mail: brooks@fr.com
Fish & Richardson P.C.
12390 El Camino Real
San Diego CA 92130
Telephone: (858) 678-5070
Facsimile: (858) 678-5099
CASE NO. 8:18-CV-01320-AG-ADS
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER
Plaintiffs,
v.
MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
Defendant.
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 8:18-CV-01320-AG-ADS
1
1.
PURPOSES AND LIMITS OF THIS ORDER
Discovery in this action is likely to involve confidential, proprietary, or
2
3
private information requiring special protection from public disclosure and from
4
use for any purpose other than this litigation. Thus, the Court enters this Protective
5
Order. This Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or
6
responses to discovery, and the protection it gives from public disclosure and use
7
extends only to the specific material entitled to confidential treatment under the
8
applicable legal principles. This Order does not automatically authorize the filing
9
under seal of material designated under this Order. Instead, the parties must comply
10
with L.R. 79-5.1 if they seek to file anything under seal. This Order does not
11
govern the use at trial of material designated under this Order.
12
2.
13
DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL
2.1 Over-Designation Prohibited. Any party or non-party who designates
14
information or items for protection under this Order as “PROTECTED DATA,”
15
“CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY,”
16
or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” (a “designator”) must only
17
designate specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. To the
18
extent practicable, only those parts of documents, items, or oral or written
19
communications that require protection shall be designated. Designations with a
20
higher confidentiality level when a lower level would suffice are prohibited. Mass,
21
indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Unjustified designations
22
expose the designator to sanctions, including the Court’s striking all confidentiality
23
designations made by that designator. Designation under this Order is allowed only
24
if the designation is necessary to protect material that, if disclosed to persons not
25
authorized to view it, would cause competitive or other recognized harm. Material
26
may not be designated if it has been made public, or if designation is otherwise
27
unnecessary to protect a secrecy interest. If a designator learns that information or
28
items that it designated for protection do not qualify for protection at all or do not
-1-
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 8:18-CV-01320-AG-ADS
1
qualify for the level of protection initially asserted, that designator must promptly
2
notify all parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation.
3
2.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Designation under this Order
4
requires the designator to affix the applicable legend (“PROTECTED DATA”,
5
“CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY,”
6
or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE”) to each page that contains
7
protected material. For testimony given in deposition or other proceeding, the
8
designator shall specify all protected testimony and the level of protection being
9
asserted. It may make that designation during the deposition or proceeding, or may
10
invoke, on the record or by written notice to all parties on or before the next
11
business day, a right to have up to 21 days from the deposition or proceeding to
12
make its designation.
13
2.2.1 A party or non-party that makes original documents or materials
14
available for inspection need not designate them for protection until after the
15
inspecting party has identified which material it would like copied and produced.
16
During the inspection and before the designation, all material shall be treated as
17
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY. After the inspecting
18
party has identified the documents it wants copied and produced, the producing
19
party must designate the documents, or portions thereof, that qualify for protection
20
under this Order.
21
2.2.2 Parties shall give advance notice if they expect a deposition or other
22
proceeding to include designated material so that the other parties can ensure that
23
only authorized individuals are present at those proceedings when such material is
24
disclosed or used. The use of a document as an exhibit at a deposition shall not in
25
any way affect its designation. Transcripts containing designated material shall
26
have a legend on the title page noting the presence of designated material, and the
27
title page shall be followed by a list of all pages (including line numbers as
28
appropriate) that have been designated, and the level of protection being asserted.
2--
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 8:18-CV-01320-AG-ADS
1
The designator shall inform the court reporter of these requirements. Any transcript
2
that is prepared before the expiration of the 21-day period for designation shall be
3
treated during that period as if it had been designated HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
4
ATTORNEY EYES ONLY unless otherwise agreed. After the expiration of the 21-
5
day period, the transcript shall be treated only as actually designated.
2.3
6
Inadvertent Failures to Designate. An inadvertent failure to
7
designate does not, standing alone, waive protection under this Order. Upon timely
8
assertion or correction of a designation, all recipients must make reasonable efforts
9
to ensure that the material is treated according to this Order.
10
3.
CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS
All challenges to confidentiality designations shall proceed under L.R. 37-1
11
12
through L.R. 37-4.
13
4.
14
ACCESS TO DESIGNATED MATERIAL
4.1
Basic Principles. A receiving party may use designated material only
15
for this litigation. Designated material may be disclosed only to the categories of
16
persons and under the conditions described in this Order. Designated material must
17
be stored and maintained by a receiving party at a location in the United States and
18
in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized
19
under this Order. Designated material must not be transported by any recipient to
20
any location outside the United States.
21
4.2
Disclosure of CONFIDENTIAL Material Without Further
22
Approval. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the
23
designator, a receiving party may disclose any material designated
24
CONFIDENTIAL only to citizens or permanent residents of the United States that
25
are one of the following:
26
4.2.1 The receiving party’s outside counsel of record in this action
27
and employees of outside counsel of record to whom disclosure is reasonably
28
necessary;
3--
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 8:18-CV-01320-AG-ADS
4.2.2 Three (3) officers, directors, and employees of the receiving
1
2
party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary, and who have signed the
3
Agreement to Be Bound (Exhibit A);
4.2.3 Experts retained by the receiving party’s outside counsel of
4
5
record to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary, and who have signed the
6
Agreement to Be Bound (Exhibit A);
7
4.2.4 The Court and its personnel;
8
4.2.5 Outside court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial
9
consultants (as well as independent mock jurors during the course of a mock
10
jury exercise), and professional vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably
11
necessary, and who have signed the Agreement to Be Bound (Exhibit A);
12
4.2.6 During their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom
13
disclosure is reasonably necessary and who have signed the Agreement to Be
14
Bound (Exhibit A); and
4.2.7 The author or recipient of a document containing the material, or
15
16
a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the
17
information.
18
4.3
Disclosure of HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES
19
ONLY and HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE Material Without
20
Further Approval. Unless permitted in writing by the designator, a receiving party
21
may disclose material designated HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY
22
EYES ONLY or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE without further
23
approval only to citizens or permanent residents of the United States that are one of
24
the following:
25
4.3.1 The receiving party’s outside counsel of record in this action
26
and employees of outside counsel of record to whom it is reasonably
27
necessary to disclose the information;
28
4.3.2 The Court and its personnel;
4--
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 8:18-CV-01320-AG-ADS
1
4.3.3 Outside court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial
2
consultants (as well as independent mock jurors during the course of a mock
3
jury exercise), and professional vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably
4
necessary, and who have signed the Agreement to Be Bound (Exhibit A); and
5
4.3.4 The author or recipient of a document containing the material, or
6
a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the
7
information.
8
4.4
9
Procedures for Approving or Objecting to Disclosure of HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY or HIGHLY
10
CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE Material to In-House Counsel or
11
Experts. Unless agreed to in writing by the designator:
12
4.4.1 A party seeking to disclose to an expert retained by outside
13
counsel of record any information or item that has been designated HIGHLY
14
CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY or HIGHLY
15
CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE must first make a written request to
16
the designator that (1) identifies the general categories of HIGHLY
17
CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY or HIGHLY
18
CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE information that the receiving party
19
seeks permission to disclose to the expert, (2) sets forth the full name of the
20
expert and the city and state of his or her primary residence, (3) attaches a
21
copy of the expert’s current resume, (4) identifies the expert’s current
22
employer(s), (5) identifies each person or entity from whom the expert has
23
received compensation or funding for work in his or her areas of expertise
24
(including in connection with litigation) in the past five years, (6) identifies
25
(by name and number of the case, filing date, and location of court) any
26
litigation where the expert has offered expert testimony, including by
27
declaration, report, or testimony at deposition or trial, in the past five years;
28
and (7) identifies the general subject matter of all unpublished patent
5--
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 8:18-CV-01320-AG-ADS
1
applications naming that individual as an inventor. If the expert believes any
2
of this information at (4) - (7) is subject to a confidentiality obligation to a
3
third party, then the expert should provide whatever information the expert
4
believes can be disclosed without violating any confidentiality agreements,
5
and the party seeking to disclose the information to the expert shall be
6
available to meet and confer with the designator regarding any such
7
confidentiality obligations.
8
4.4.2 A party that makes a request and provides the information
9
specified in paragraph 4.4.1 may disclose the designated material to the
10
identified in-house counsel or expert unless, within seven days of delivering
11
the request, the party receives a written objection from the designator
12
providing detailed grounds for the objection.
4.4.3 All challenges to objections from the designator shall proceed
13
under L.R. 37-1 through L.R. 37-4.
14
15
5.
SOURCE CODE
16
5.1 Designation of Source Code. If production of source code is necessary,
17
a party may designate it as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE if it is,
18
or includes, confidential, proprietary, or trade secret source code.
19
5.2 Location and Supervision of Inspection. Any HIGHLY
20
CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE produced in discovery shall be made
21
available for inspection, in a format allowing it to be reasonably reviewed and
22
searched, during normal business hours or at other mutually agreeable times, at an
23
office of the designating party’s counsel or another mutually agreeable location.
24
Once a designating party makes available its Source Code, the inspecting party
25
shall provide notice of its intent to review that Source Code at least seven (7)
26
business days in advance of the initial inspection, and three (3) business days in
27
advance of any subsequent inspection. The source code shall be made available for
28
inspection on a secured, “stand-alone” computer (a computer that is not linked to
6--
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 8:18-CV-01320-AG-ADS
1
any network, including a local area network “LAN”, an intranet, or the Internet) in
2
a secured room, and the inspecting party shall not copy, remove, or otherwise
3
transfer any portion of the source code onto any recordable media or recordable
4
device. No recordable media, recordable devices, computers, cell phones, or other
5
electronic devices may be brought into the secured room, but handwritten notes
6
may be taken in the secured room, so long as those handwritten notes do not copy
7
verbatim any lines of the Source Code. The designator may visually monitor the
8
activities of the inspecting party’s representatives during any source code review,
9
but only to ensure that there is no unauthorized recording, copying, or transmission
10
of the source code. The inspecting party shall make reasonable efforts to restrict its
11
requests for such access to the stand-alone computer(s) to normal business hours,
12
which for purposes of this paragraph shall be 9:00 a.m. through 6:00 p.m. local
13
time. All persons who will review source code on behalf of a receiving party,
14
including members of the receiving party’s law firm, shall be identified in writing
15
to the producing party at least 48 hours in advance of the first time that such person
16
reviews such source code. Such identification shall be in addition to any other
17
disclosure required under this Order.
18
5.3 Paper Copies of Source Code Excerpts. The inspecting party may
19
request paper copies of limited portions of source code not to exceed 250 pages for
20
any one accused product, and with no contiguous block greater than 35 pages, that
21
are reasonably necessary for the preparation of court filings, pleadings, expert
22
reports, other papers, or for deposition or trial. The receiving party may request to
23
print additional pages beyond the aforementioned limits; the parties will meet and
24
confer in good faith within three (3) business days regarding such a request, and
25
such a request will not be unreasonably denied. If the producing party does not
26
agree to the request of the receiving party, the producing party will not object to the
27
receiving party’s request for expedited briefing regarding the producing party’s
28
denial of the request. The designator shall provide all such source code in paper
7--
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 8:18-CV-01320-AG-ADS
1
form, including Bates numbers and the label “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
2
SOURCE CODE.” The inspecting party shall maintain a log of all paper copies of
3
the source code including the names of the custodian(s) or location(s) where the
4
paper copies are store when not in use. No more than a total of (5) individuals
5
identified by the receiving party shall have access to the printed portions of source
6
code (except insofar as such code appears in any court filing or expert report). The
7
inspecting party shall provide a copy of this log to the producing party within seven
8
(7) days of any request by the producing party.
5.4 Access Record. The inspecting party shall maintain a record of any
9
10
individual who has inspected any portion of the source code in electronic or paper
11
form, and shall maintain all paper copies of any printed portions of the source code
12
in a secured, locked area. The inspecting party shall not convert any of the
13
information contained in the paper copies into any electronic format other than for
14
the preparation of a pleading, exhibit, expert report, discovery document, deposition
15
transcript, or other Court document. Any paper copies used during a deposition
16
shall be retrieved at the end of each day and must not be left with a court reporter or
17
any other unauthorized individual.
5.5 Transfer of Source Code. A producing party’s source code paper copies
18
19
may only be transported by the receiving party on paper via secure and reliable
20
hand carry. Source code paper copies may not be transported or transmitted
21
electronically over a network of any kind or the Internet.
22
6.
23
HANDLING OF PROTECTED DATA
6.1 Protected Data. “Protected Data”: refers to any information that a party
24
or non-party reasonably believes to be subject to federal, state or foreign Data
25
Protection Laws or other privacy obligations. Protected Data constitutes highly
26
sensitive materials requiring special protection. Examples of such Data Protection
27
Laws include, without limitation, The Gramm-Leach-Biley Act, 15 U.S.C. § 6801
28
et seq. (financial information); The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
8--
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 8:18-CV-01320-AG-ADS
1
Act (“HIPAA”) and the regulations thereunder, 45 CFR Part 160 and Subparts A
2
and E of Part 164 (medical information); Regulation (EU) 2016/679 Of the
3
European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the Protection of
4
Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free
5
Movement of Such Data, also known as the General Data Protection Regulation
6
(“GDPR”).
6.2 Disclosure of Protected Data. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or
7
8
permitted in writing by the designating party, a receiving party may disclose any
9
information or item designated “PROTECTED DATA” only to certain groups of
10
individuals that can receive HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES
11
ONLY materials, as indicated in Section 4.3 herein.
6.3 The parties agree that productions of Protected Data Information may
12
13
require additional safeguards pursuant to Federal, State or foreign statutes,
14
regulations or privacy obligations and will meet and confer to implement these
15
safeguards if and when needed.
16
7.
17
PROSECUTION BAR
Absent written consent from the designator, any individual who receives
18
access to HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY or HIGHLY
19
CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE information shall not be involved in the
20
prosecution of patents or patent applications concerning the field of the invention of
21
the patents-in-suit for the receiving party or its acquirer, successor, predecessor, or
22
other affiliate during the pendency of this action and for one year after its
23
conclusion, including any appeals. “Prosecution” means drafting, amending,
24
advising on the content of, or otherwise affecting the scope or content of patent
25
claims or specifications. These prohibitions shall not preclude counsel from
26
participating in reexamination or inter partes review proceedings to challenge or
27
defend the validity of any patent, but counsel may not participate in the formulation
28
or drafting of amended claims in any such proceedings.
9--
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 8:18-CV-01320-AG-ADS
1
8.
2
PRODUCED IN OTHER LITIGATION
3
PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED
8.1 Subpoenas and Court Orders. This Order in no way excuses non-
4
compliance with a lawful subpoena or court order. The purpose of the duties
5
described in this section is to alert the interested parties to the existence of this
6
Order and to give the designator an opportunity to protect its confidentiality
7
interests in the court where the subpoena or order issued.
8
9
8.2 Notification Requirement. If a party is served with a subpoena or a
court order issued in other litigation that compels disclosure of any information or
10
items designated in this action as PROTECTED DATA, CONFIDENTIAL,
11
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY, or HIGHLY
12
CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE, that party must:
13
14
15
8.2.1 Promptly notify the designator in writing. Such notification shall
include a copy of the subpoena or court order;
8.2.2 Promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or
16
order to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered
17
by the subpoena or order is subject to this Order. Such notification shall
18
include a copy of this Order; and
19
8.2.3 Cooperate with all reasonable procedures sought by the
20
designator whose material may be affected.
21
8.3 Wait For Resolution of Protective Order. If the designator timely
22
seeks a protective order, the party served with the subpoena or court order shall not
23
produce any information designated in this action as PROTECTED DATA,
24
CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY or
25
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE before a determination by the court
26
where the subpoena or order issued, unless the party has obtained the designator’s
27
permission. The designator shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection
28
of its confidential material in that court.
10
--
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 8:18-CV-01320-AG-ADS
1
9.
UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF DESIGNATED MATERIAL
2
If a receiving party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed
3
designated material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this
4
Order, it must immediately (1) notify in writing the designator of the unauthorized
5
disclosures, (2) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the
6
designated material, (3) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized
7
disclosures were made of all the terms of this Order, and (4) use reasonable efforts
8
to have such person or persons execute the Agreement to Be Bound (Exhibit A).
9
10.
10
INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE
PROTECTED MATERIAL
11
Nothing in this Order shall require the production of documents, information
12
or other material that a Party contends is protected from disclosure by the attorney-
13
client privilege, the work product doctrine, or other privilege, doctrine or immunity.
14
When a producing party gives notice that certain inadvertently produced material is
15
subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the receiving
16
parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This
17
provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-
18
discovery order that provides for production without prior privilege review pursuant
19
to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and (e).
20
11.
21
FILING UNDER SEAL
Without written permission from the designator or a Court order, a party may
22
not file in the public record in this action any designated material. A party seeking
23
to file under seal any designated material must comply with L.R. 79-5.1. Filings
24
may be made under seal only pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the
25
specific material at issue. The fact that a document has been designated under this
26
Order is insufficient to justify filing under seal. Instead, parties must explain the
27
basis for confidentiality of each document sought to be filed under seal. Because a
28
party other than the designator will often be seeking to file designated material,
11
--
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 8:18-CV-01320-AG-ADS
1
cooperation between the parties in preparing, and in reducing the number and extent
2
of, requests for under seal filing is essential. If a receiving party’s request to file
3
designated material under seal pursuant to L.R. 79-5.1 is denied by the Court, then
4
the receiving party may file the material in the public record unless (1) the
5
designator seeks reconsideration within four days of the denial, or (2) as otherwise
6
instructed by the Court.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
12
--
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 8:18-CV-01320-AG-ADS
1
2
12.
FINAL DISPOSITION
Within 30 days after the final disposition of this action, each party shall
3
return all designated material to the designator or destroy such material, including
4
all copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries, and any other format reproducing or
5
capturing any designated material. The receiving party must submit a written
6
certification to the designator by the 30-day deadline that (1) identifies (by
7
category, where appropriate) all the designated material that was returned or
8
destroyed, and (2) affirms that the receiving party has not retained any copies,
9
abstracts, compilations, summaries, or any other format reproducing or capturing
10
any of the designated material. This provision shall not prevent outside counsel
11
from retaining an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition,
12
and hearing transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition and trial
13
exhibits, expert reports, undisclosed attorney work product, and undisclosed
14
consultant and expert work product, even if such materials contain designated
15
material. Any such archival copies remain subject to this Order.
16
Dated: November 20, 2018
17
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
18
19
/s/ M. Elizabeth Day
M. Elizabeth Day
20
/s/ Amir Kazi
Amir Kazi
21
Attorneys for Defendants
22
Dated: November 20, 2018
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
25
DATED: November 21, 2018
/s/ Autumn D. Spaeth
__________________________________
HON. AUTUMN D. SPAETH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
13
--
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 8:18-CV-01320-AG-ADS
1
EXHIBIT A
2
AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND
3
I, _____________________________ [print or type full name], of
4
_________________ [print or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury
5
that I have read in its entirety and understand the Protective Order that was issued
6
by the United States District Court for the Central District of California on _______
7
[date] in the case of ___________ [insert formal name of the case and the number
8
and initials assigned to it by the court]. I agree to comply with and to be bound by
9
all the terms of this Protective Order, and I understand and acknowledge that failure
10
to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment for contempt. I
11
solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item
12
that is subject to this Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict
13
compliance with this Order.
14
I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court
15
for the Central District of California for the purpose of enforcing this Order, even if
16
such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action.
17
I hereby appoint __________________________ [print or type full name] of
18
_______________________________________ [print or type full address and
19
telephone number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with
20
this action or any proceedings related to enforcement of this Order.
21
Date: ___________________________
22
City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________
23
24
25
26
27
Printed name: ____________________
[printed name]
Signature: _______________________
[signature]
28
14
--
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 8:18-CV-01320-AG-ADS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?