James Rutherford v. Coastland Chapman Plaza, L.P. et al
Filing
33
ORDER DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 32 by Judge Josephine L. Staton, the Court hereby enters a dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiffs Complaint in the above-entitled action, in its entirety. Each party shall bear his or its own costs and attorneys' fees. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
1
2
3
4
JS-6
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
JAMES RUTHERFORD, an
individual,
14
Case No. 8:19-cv-01891-JLS-ADS
Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE
15
v.
16
19
COASTLAND CHAPMAN
PLAZA, L.P., a California limited
partnership; and DOES 1-10,
inclusive,
20
Defendants.
17
18
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
ORDER DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
1
2
3
After consideration of the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal of the entire action
with Prejudice filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford (“Plaintiff”) and Coastland
Chapman Plaza, L.P. (“Defendant”), the Court hereby enters a dismissal with
4
5
prejudice of Plaintiff’s Complaint in the above-entitled action, in its entirety. Each
6
party shall bear his or its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
11
DATED: September 11, 2020
JOSEPHINE L. STATON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
ORDER DISMISSAL WITH REJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?