Samick Music Corp. v. Garrett Gordon et al

Filing 81

ENTERING PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GARRETT GORDON by Judge George H. Wu. For GOOD CAUSE shown, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that a PERMANENT INJUCTION IS HEREBY ENTERED against Defendant Garret Gordon: 1. Defendant Garrett Gord on ("Defendant Gordon") and Defendant Gordon's officers, agents, servants, employees, representatives, associates, related corporate entities, owners, and operators, and/or all persons acting for, on behalf of, or in concert or coope ration with any of them (including but not limited to Defendant Naomi Mason, also known as "Kali Mason" ("Defendant Mason")) and who have notice of this Permanent Injunction, is and are hereby PERMANENTLY RESTRAINED AND ENJOINED: (see document for full details/deadlines). (mrgo)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 SAMICK MUSIC CORP., dba “HEALTH MATE,” 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff, v. Case No. SACV 20-395-GW-JDEx ORDER ENTERING PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GARRETT GORDON Action Filed: February 26, 2020 GARRETT GORDON, an individual; NAOMI MASON, a.k.a. “KALI MASON,” an individual; and DOES 1-25, inclusive, Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1[PROPOSED] ORDER ENTERING PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GARRETT GORDON 1 PERMANENT INJUNCTION 2 TO DEFENDANT GARRETT GORDON: 3 The Court has reviewed and considered the Stipulation Between Plaintiff 4 Samick Music Corp. and Defendant Garrett Gordon for Entry of Permanent 5 Injunction Against Defendant Garrett Gordon, filed on April 26, 2021. 6 For GOOD CAUSE shown, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND 7 DECREED that a PERMANENT INJUCTION IS HEREBY ENTERED 8 against Defendant Garret Gordon: 9 1. Defendant Garrett Gordon (“Defendant Gordon”) and Defendant 10 Gordon’s officers, agents, servants, employees, representatives, associates, related 11 corporate entities, owners, and operators, and/or all persons acting for, on behalf of, 12 or in concert or cooperation with any of them (including but not limited to Defendant 13 Naomi Mason, also known as “Kali Mason” (“Defendant Mason”)) and who have 14 notice of this Permanent Injunction, is and are hereby PERMANENTLY 15 RESTRAINED AND ENJOINED: 16 a. From any and all use of Plaintiff Samick Music Corp.’s 17 HEALTH MATE Trademarks and/or its HEALTH MATE Logos, including without 18 limitation, the use of the following: Health Mate’s federal trademarks registered with 19 the United States Patent and Trademark Office (Nos. 2167332, 2167330, 574507, 20 and 5980703); “HEALTH MATE”; “HEALTH MATE SAUNA”; “HEALTH 21 MATE” combined with a lachrymiform shape trisected by two asymmetrical vertical 22 swirls; a lachrymiform shape trisected by two asymmetrical vertical swirls; 23 “HEALTH MATE REPLACEMENT PARTS”; or any other confusingly similar 24 variation, combination, or derivation that includes the words “HEALTH MATE.” 25 This provision applies, without limitation, to the use or display of any of the 26 foregoing in any Internet domain name or website, business name, account, 27 advertisement, customer review, purported customer review, video, email address, 28 -2[PROPOSED] ORDER ENTERING PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GARRETT GORDON 1 email message or transmission, text message or transmission, promotional or 2 marketing materials, facsimile transmissions, invoices, letterhead, mailing, or 3 packaging, whether in written, recorded, paper, or electronic form or format, for any 4 reason whatsoever, or in connection with the advertisement, sale, attempted sale, or 5 packaging of any product. b. 6 From any and all use of the “Health Mate” trade name or 7 corporate name, including without limitation the use of “Health Mate Fulfillment,” 8 “Health Mate Sauna,” “Health Mate Sauna Fulfillment,” “Health Mate Wellness,” 9 “Health Mate Infrared Sauna,” “HM Corporate Sales,” or any other confusingly 10 similar variation, combination, or derivation that includes the words “Health Mate” 11 or the letters “HM.” This provision applies, without limitation, to the use or display 12 of the word “Health Mate” or “HM” in any Internet domain name or website, 13 business name, account, advertisement, customer review, purported customer 14 review, video, email address, email message or transmission, text message or 15 transmission, promotional or marketing materials, facsimile transmissions, invoices, 16 letterhead, mailing, or packaging, whether in written, recorded, paper, or electronic 17 form or format, for any reason whatsoever, or in connection with the advertisement, 18 sale, attempted sale, or packaging of any product. c. 19 20 From registering any domain name that includes “Health Mate” or any confusingly similar combination of words. d. 21 From assigning, transferring or otherwise hypothecating the 22 healthmateparts.com domain name to anyone other than to Plaintiff or to Plaintiff’s 23 designee. 24 e. From directly or indirectly accessing, using, transferring, 25 transmitting, assigning, disclosing, or making available to any person or entity other 26 than to Plaintiff, any of Plaintiff’s confidential or trade secret documents, data or 27 information, including but not limited to the information that was contained in the 28 -3[PROPOSED] ORDER ENTERING PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GARRETT GORDON 1 customer resource management database known as Pipedrive prior to Defendant 2 Gordon’s transfer of Pipedrive to Health Mate pursuant to the Preliminary Injunction 3 entered in this matter. f. 4 Other than as specified in the Parties’ Confidential Global 5 Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release of All Claims, from using or having 6 possession, custody, or control of any of Plaintiff’s confidential or trade secret 7 documents, data or information, including but not limited to the information that was 8 contained in the customer resource management database known as Pipedrive prior 9 to Defendant Gordon’s transfer of Pipedrive to Health Mate pursuant to the 10 Preliminary Injunction entered in this matter. 11 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED: 12 2. Defendant Gordon and Defendant Gordon’s officers, agents, servants, 13 employees, representatives, associates, related corporate entities, owners, and 14 operators, and/or all persons acting for, on behalf of, or in concert or cooperation 15 with any of them (including but not limited to Defendant Mason) and who have 16 notice of this Order shall: a. 17 Forthwith take all necessary steps and actions to assist the 18 registrar in transferring the “healthmateparts.com” domain name to Plaintiff’s 19 designee. 20 b. Forthwith transfer any and all content associated with the website 21 located at www.healthmateparts.com to Plaintiff’s designee, or file with the Court 22 and serve on Plaintiff a certification in writing, under oath, that all such content has 23 been destroyed (“Compliance Report”). To the extent such content may be in the 24 possession of Expert Data Forensics (“EDF”), a Nevada-based licensed digital 25 forensics investigation firm retained by Defendant Gordon, Defendant Gordon may 26 rely on a written confirmation from EDF that all data in its possession has been 27 destroyed. Defendant Gordon may make the certification required by this Paragraph 28 -4[PROPOSED] ORDER ENTERING PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GARRETT GORDON 1 2(b) individually based on a written confirmation from EDF (with such written 2 confirmation to be appended to the Compliance Report) or EDF may make the 3 certification on behalf of Defendant Gordon. The Compliance Report shall be filed 4 and served in accordance with Paragraph 3. 5 6 3. By May 10, 2021, Defendant Gordon shall: a. Disclose to Plaintiff any and all of Defendant Gordon’s officers, 7 agents, servants, employees, representatives, associates, related corporate entities, 8 owners, and operators, and/or all persons acting for, on behalf of, or in concert or 9 cooperation with any of them (including but not limited to Defendant Mason but 10 excluding Defendant Gordon’s legal counsel in this action), who to the best of 11 Gordon’s knowledge and understanding, may possess or may have custody or 12 control of any of the information specified in Paragraph 1(f) above. Such disclosure 13 shall include the name, last known address, last known cell phone number, and last 14 known email address of the foregoing persons, if any; and 15 16 b. As part of the Compliance Report, file with the Court and serve on Plaintiff a certification in writing, under oath, that: 17 i. Defendant Gordon has disclosed to Plaintiff all persons in 18 accordance with Paragraph 3(a), or that, to the best of Gordon’s knowledge and 19 understanding, no person possesses or has custody or control of any of the 20 information specified in Paragraph 1(f) above. 21 ii. Defendant Gordon does not have possession, custody, or 22 control of any of Plaintiff’s confidential or trade secret documents, data or 23 information, including but not limited to the information that was contained in the 24 customer resource management database known as Pipedrive prior to Defendant 25 Gordon’s transfer of Pipedrive to Health Mate pursuant to the Preliminary Injunction 26 entered in this matter. 27 28 -5[PROPOSED] ORDER ENTERING PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GARRETT GORDON iii. 1 To the best of Defendant Gordon’s knowledge (provided 2 that Defendant Mason is not employed by Defendant Gordon as of the date of 3 certification), Defendant Mason does not have possession, custody, or control of any 4 of Plaintiff’s confidential or trade secret documents, data or information, including 5 but not limited to the information that was contained in the customer resource 6 management database known as Pipedrive prior to Defendant Gordon’s transfer of 7 Pipedrive to Health Mate pursuant to the Preliminary Injunction entered in this 8 matter. iv. 9 EDF does not have possession, custody, or control of any 10 of Plaintiff’s confidential or trade secret documents, data or information, including 11 but not limited to the information that was contained in the customer resource 12 management database known as Pipedrive prior to Defendant Gordon’s transfer of 13 Pipedrive to Health Mate pursuant to the Preliminary Injunction entered in this 14 matter. For purposes of this paragraph, Defendant Gordon may rely on a written 15 confirmation from EDF that all data in its possession has been destroyed. Defendant 16 Gordon may make the certification required by this Paragraph 3(b)(iv) individually 17 based on a written confirmation from EDF (with such written confirmation to be 18 appended to the Compliance Report) or EDF may make the certification on behalf 19 of Defendant Gordon. 20 21 22 4. By noon on May 6, 2021, Defendant Gordon shall serve on Plaintiff a draft of the Compliance Report. 5. Defendant Gordon shall forthwith deliver to Defendant Mason and any 23 other persons described paragraph 3(a) above, if any, a copy of this Stipulated 24 Permanent Injunction once entered by the Court and ask Defendant Mason to 25 acknowledge receipt. Defendant Gordon shall forthwith provide notice to Plaintiff 26 of compliance with this paragraph, including whether Defendant Mason 27 acknowledges receipt. 28 -6[PROPOSED] ORDER ENTERING PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GARRETT GORDON 1 6. Nothing herein shall prohibit Plaintiff from (a) seeking a modification 2 of this Permanent Injunction if it becomes aware of additional information or other 3 issues relating to Defendant Gordon’s compliance with the terms of this Permanent 4 Injunction; or (b) seeking any other remedy available or permitted under law. 5 7. 6 Gordon. 7 Nothing herein shall constitute an admission of liability by Defendant IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: April 27, 2021 Hon. George H. Wu United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Submitted by: /s/ Harvinder S. Anand HARVINDER S. ANAND Attorneys for Plaintiff Samick Music Corp., dba “Health Mate” 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -7[PROPOSED] ORDER ENTERING PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GARRETT GORDON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?