Samick Music Corp. v. Garrett Gordon et al
Filing
81
ENTERING PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GARRETT GORDON by Judge George H. Wu. For GOOD CAUSE shown, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that a PERMANENT INJUCTION IS HEREBY ENTERED against Defendant Garret Gordon: 1. Defendant Garrett Gord on ("Defendant Gordon") and Defendant Gordon's officers, agents, servants, employees, representatives, associates, related corporate entities, owners, and operators, and/or all persons acting for, on behalf of, or in concert or coope ration with any of them (including but not limited to Defendant Naomi Mason, also known as "Kali Mason" ("Defendant Mason")) and who have notice of this Permanent Injunction, is and are hereby PERMANENTLY RESTRAINED AND ENJOINED: (see document for full details/deadlines). (mrgo)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
SAMICK MUSIC CORP.,
dba “HEALTH MATE,”
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. SACV 20-395-GW-JDEx
ORDER ENTERING PERMANENT
INJUNCTION AGAINST
DEFENDANT GARRETT GORDON
Action Filed: February 26, 2020
GARRETT GORDON, an individual;
NAOMI MASON, a.k.a. “KALI
MASON,” an individual;
and DOES 1-25, inclusive,
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER ENTERING PERMANENT
INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GARRETT GORDON
1
PERMANENT INJUNCTION
2
TO DEFENDANT GARRETT GORDON:
3
The Court has reviewed and considered the Stipulation Between Plaintiff
4
Samick Music Corp. and Defendant Garrett Gordon for Entry of Permanent
5
Injunction Against Defendant Garrett Gordon, filed on April 26, 2021.
6
For GOOD CAUSE shown, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND
7
DECREED that a PERMANENT INJUCTION IS HEREBY ENTERED
8
against Defendant Garret Gordon:
9
1.
Defendant Garrett Gordon (“Defendant Gordon”) and Defendant
10
Gordon’s officers, agents, servants, employees, representatives, associates, related
11
corporate entities, owners, and operators, and/or all persons acting for, on behalf of,
12
or in concert or cooperation with any of them (including but not limited to Defendant
13
Naomi Mason, also known as “Kali Mason” (“Defendant Mason”)) and who have
14
notice of this Permanent Injunction, is and are hereby PERMANENTLY
15
RESTRAINED AND ENJOINED:
16
a.
From any and all use of Plaintiff Samick Music Corp.’s
17
HEALTH MATE Trademarks and/or its HEALTH MATE Logos, including without
18
limitation, the use of the following: Health Mate’s federal trademarks registered with
19
the United States Patent and Trademark Office (Nos. 2167332, 2167330, 574507,
20
and 5980703); “HEALTH MATE”; “HEALTH MATE SAUNA”; “HEALTH
21
MATE” combined with a lachrymiform shape trisected by two asymmetrical vertical
22
swirls; a lachrymiform shape trisected by two asymmetrical vertical swirls;
23
“HEALTH MATE REPLACEMENT PARTS”; or any other confusingly similar
24
variation, combination, or derivation that includes the words “HEALTH MATE.”
25
This provision applies, without limitation, to the use or display of any of the
26
foregoing in any Internet domain name or website, business name, account,
27
advertisement, customer review, purported customer review, video, email address,
28
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER ENTERING PERMANENT
INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GARRETT GORDON
1
email message or transmission, text message or transmission, promotional or
2
marketing materials, facsimile transmissions, invoices, letterhead, mailing, or
3
packaging, whether in written, recorded, paper, or electronic form or format, for any
4
reason whatsoever, or in connection with the advertisement, sale, attempted sale, or
5
packaging of any product.
b.
6
From any and all use of the “Health Mate” trade name or
7
corporate name, including without limitation the use of “Health Mate Fulfillment,”
8
“Health Mate Sauna,” “Health Mate Sauna Fulfillment,” “Health Mate Wellness,”
9
“Health Mate Infrared Sauna,” “HM Corporate Sales,” or any other confusingly
10
similar variation, combination, or derivation that includes the words “Health Mate”
11
or the letters “HM.” This provision applies, without limitation, to the use or display
12
of the word “Health Mate” or “HM” in any Internet domain name or website,
13
business name, account, advertisement, customer review, purported customer
14
review, video, email address, email message or transmission, text message or
15
transmission, promotional or marketing materials, facsimile transmissions, invoices,
16
letterhead, mailing, or packaging, whether in written, recorded, paper, or electronic
17
form or format, for any reason whatsoever, or in connection with the advertisement,
18
sale, attempted sale, or packaging of any product.
c.
19
20
From registering any domain name that includes “Health Mate”
or any confusingly similar combination of words.
d.
21
From assigning, transferring or otherwise hypothecating the
22
healthmateparts.com domain name to anyone other than to Plaintiff or to Plaintiff’s
23
designee.
24
e.
From directly or indirectly accessing, using, transferring,
25
transmitting, assigning, disclosing, or making available to any person or entity other
26
than to Plaintiff, any of Plaintiff’s confidential or trade secret documents, data or
27
information, including but not limited to the information that was contained in the
28
-3[PROPOSED] ORDER ENTERING PERMANENT
INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GARRETT GORDON
1
customer resource management database known as Pipedrive prior to Defendant
2
Gordon’s transfer of Pipedrive to Health Mate pursuant to the Preliminary Injunction
3
entered in this matter.
f.
4
Other than as specified in the Parties’ Confidential Global
5
Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release of All Claims, from using or having
6
possession, custody, or control of any of Plaintiff’s confidential or trade secret
7
documents, data or information, including but not limited to the information that was
8
contained in the customer resource management database known as Pipedrive prior
9
to Defendant Gordon’s transfer of Pipedrive to Health Mate pursuant to the
10
Preliminary Injunction entered in this matter.
11
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED:
12
2.
Defendant Gordon and Defendant Gordon’s officers, agents, servants,
13
employees, representatives, associates, related corporate entities, owners, and
14
operators, and/or all persons acting for, on behalf of, or in concert or cooperation
15
with any of them (including but not limited to Defendant Mason) and who have
16
notice of this Order shall:
a.
17
Forthwith take all necessary steps and actions to assist the
18
registrar in transferring the “healthmateparts.com” domain name to Plaintiff’s
19
designee.
20
b.
Forthwith transfer any and all content associated with the website
21
located at www.healthmateparts.com to Plaintiff’s designee, or file with the Court
22
and serve on Plaintiff a certification in writing, under oath, that all such content has
23
been destroyed (“Compliance Report”). To the extent such content may be in the
24
possession of Expert Data Forensics (“EDF”), a Nevada-based licensed digital
25
forensics investigation firm retained by Defendant Gordon, Defendant Gordon may
26
rely on a written confirmation from EDF that all data in its possession has been
27
destroyed. Defendant Gordon may make the certification required by this Paragraph
28
-4[PROPOSED] ORDER ENTERING PERMANENT
INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GARRETT GORDON
1
2(b) individually based on a written confirmation from EDF (with such written
2
confirmation to be appended to the Compliance Report) or EDF may make the
3
certification on behalf of Defendant Gordon. The Compliance Report shall be filed
4
and served in accordance with Paragraph 3.
5
6
3.
By May 10, 2021, Defendant Gordon shall:
a.
Disclose to Plaintiff any and all of Defendant Gordon’s officers,
7
agents, servants, employees, representatives, associates, related corporate entities,
8
owners, and operators, and/or all persons acting for, on behalf of, or in concert or
9
cooperation with any of them (including but not limited to Defendant Mason but
10
excluding Defendant Gordon’s legal counsel in this action), who to the best of
11
Gordon’s knowledge and understanding, may possess or may have custody or
12
control of any of the information specified in Paragraph 1(f) above. Such disclosure
13
shall include the name, last known address, last known cell phone number, and last
14
known email address of the foregoing persons, if any; and
15
16
b.
As part of the Compliance Report, file with the Court and serve
on Plaintiff a certification in writing, under oath, that:
17
i. Defendant Gordon has disclosed to Plaintiff all persons in
18
accordance with Paragraph 3(a), or that, to the best of Gordon’s knowledge and
19
understanding, no person possesses or has custody or control of any of the
20
information specified in Paragraph 1(f) above.
21
ii.
Defendant Gordon does not have possession, custody, or
22
control of any of Plaintiff’s confidential or trade secret documents, data or
23
information, including but not limited to the information that was contained in the
24
customer resource management database known as Pipedrive prior to Defendant
25
Gordon’s transfer of Pipedrive to Health Mate pursuant to the Preliminary Injunction
26
entered in this matter.
27
28
-5[PROPOSED] ORDER ENTERING PERMANENT
INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GARRETT GORDON
iii.
1
To the best of Defendant Gordon’s knowledge (provided
2
that Defendant Mason is not employed by Defendant Gordon as of the date of
3
certification), Defendant Mason does not have possession, custody, or control of any
4
of Plaintiff’s confidential or trade secret documents, data or information, including
5
but not limited to the information that was contained in the customer resource
6
management database known as Pipedrive prior to Defendant Gordon’s transfer of
7
Pipedrive to Health Mate pursuant to the Preliminary Injunction entered in this
8
matter.
iv.
9
EDF does not have possession, custody, or control of any
10
of Plaintiff’s confidential or trade secret documents, data or information, including
11
but not limited to the information that was contained in the customer resource
12
management database known as Pipedrive prior to Defendant Gordon’s transfer of
13
Pipedrive to Health Mate pursuant to the Preliminary Injunction entered in this
14
matter. For purposes of this paragraph, Defendant Gordon may rely on a written
15
confirmation from EDF that all data in its possession has been destroyed. Defendant
16
Gordon may make the certification required by this Paragraph 3(b)(iv) individually
17
based on a written confirmation from EDF (with such written confirmation to be
18
appended to the Compliance Report) or EDF may make the certification on behalf
19
of Defendant Gordon.
20
21
22
4.
By noon on May 6, 2021, Defendant Gordon shall serve on Plaintiff a
draft of the Compliance Report.
5.
Defendant Gordon shall forthwith deliver to Defendant Mason and any
23
other persons described paragraph 3(a) above, if any, a copy of this Stipulated
24
Permanent Injunction once entered by the Court and ask Defendant Mason to
25
acknowledge receipt. Defendant Gordon shall forthwith provide notice to Plaintiff
26
of compliance with this paragraph, including whether Defendant Mason
27
acknowledges receipt.
28
-6[PROPOSED] ORDER ENTERING PERMANENT
INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GARRETT GORDON
1
6.
Nothing herein shall prohibit Plaintiff from (a) seeking a modification
2
of this Permanent Injunction if it becomes aware of additional information or other
3
issues relating to Defendant Gordon’s compliance with the terms of this Permanent
4
Injunction; or (b) seeking any other remedy available or permitted under law.
5
7.
6
Gordon.
7
Nothing herein shall constitute an admission of liability by Defendant
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
Dated: April 27, 2021
Hon. George H. Wu
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Submitted by:
/s/ Harvinder S. Anand
HARVINDER S. ANAND
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Samick Music Corp., dba “Health Mate”
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-7[PROPOSED] ORDER ENTERING PERMANENT
INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GARRETT GORDON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?