Karen Dinunzio v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
Filing
14
ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL (FRCP Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)) by Judge James V. Selna, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 13 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice as to all plaintiff's claims, acti ons and causes of action asserted against defendants. Each party is to bear its own costs and fees, including, but not limited to, attorney's fees and expert fees. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the action for 90 days following the entry of this Order (unless extended) for the purposes of enforcing the terms of the parties' settlement agreement. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (es)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Vincent Galvin (SBN# 104448)
Vincent.Galvin@bowmanandbrooke.com
BOWMAN AND BROOKE LLP
1741 Technology Drive, Suite 200
San Jose, CA 95110
Telephone No.: (408) 279-5393
Fax No.: (408) 279-5845
Dennis P Ziemba
dziemba@eckertseamans.com
Eckert Seamans Cherin and Mellott LLC
Two Liberty Place
50 South 16th Street 2nd Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19102
Telephone No. (215) 851-8400
Fax No.: (215) 851-8383
Eric S. Carroll
ecarroll@esclegal.com
Law Office of Eric S. Carroll LLC
150 North Randor - Chester Road
Suite F200
Rando, PA 19087
Telephone No.: (484) 362-9131
Fax No.: (484) 346-4400
Attorney for Plaintiff
Karen DiNunzio
JS-6
Attorneys for Defendants
Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc., et al.
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF CALIFORNIA
15
CENTRAL DISTRICT
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
IN RE: TOYOTA MOTOR CORP.
UNINTENDED ACCELERATION
MARKETING SALES PRACTICES
AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION
This document relates to:
Karen DiNunzio v. Toyota Motor
Corporation, et al.;
Case No.: 8:20-cv-00734
23
Case No. 8:10ML02151 JVS (FMOx)
8:20CV00734JVS(FMOx)
ORDER ON STIPULATION OF
DISMISSAL
(FRCP Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii))
The Court, having read the Stipulation of Dismissal filed by all parties to have
24
25
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
appeared in this action, and finding good cause,
26
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed in its entirety with
27
28
prejudice as to all plaintiff's claims, actions and causes of action asserted against
26480395
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL (FRCP Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii))
1
2
defendants. Each party is to bear its own costs and fees, including, but not limited to,
attorney's fees and expert fees. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the action for 90
3
4
5
days following the entry of this Order (unless extended) for the purposes of enforcing the
terms of the parties’ settlement agreement.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: July 29, 2022
8
9
Honorable James V. Selna
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
26480395
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL (FRCP Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii))
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?