Karen Dinunzio v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al

Filing 14

ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL (FRCP Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)) by Judge James V. Selna, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 13 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice as to all plaintiff's claims, acti ons and causes of action asserted against defendants. Each party is to bear its own costs and fees, including, but not limited to, attorney's fees and expert fees. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the action for 90 days following the entry of this Order (unless extended) for the purposes of enforcing the terms of the parties' settlement agreement. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (es)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Vincent Galvin (SBN# 104448) Vincent.Galvin@bowmanandbrooke.com BOWMAN AND BROOKE LLP 1741 Technology Drive, Suite 200 San Jose, CA 95110 Telephone No.: (408) 279-5393 Fax No.: (408) 279-5845 Dennis P Ziemba dziemba@eckertseamans.com Eckert Seamans Cherin and Mellott LLC Two Liberty Place 50 South 16th Street 2nd Floor Philadelphia, PA 19102 Telephone No. (215) 851-8400 Fax No.: (215) 851-8383 Eric S. Carroll ecarroll@esclegal.com Law Office of Eric S. Carroll LLC 150 North Randor - Chester Road Suite F200 Rando, PA 19087 Telephone No.: (484) 362-9131 Fax No.: (484) 346-4400 Attorney for Plaintiff Karen DiNunzio JS-6 Attorneys for Defendants Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc., et al. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF CALIFORNIA 15 CENTRAL DISTRICT 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 IN RE: TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. UNINTENDED ACCELERATION MARKETING SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION This document relates to: Karen DiNunzio v. Toyota Motor Corporation, et al.; Case No.: 8:20-cv-00734 23 Case No. 8:10ML02151 JVS (FMOx) 8:20CV00734JVS(FMOx) ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL (FRCP Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)) The Court, having read the Stipulation of Dismissal filed by all parties to have 24 25 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) appeared in this action, and finding good cause, 26 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed in its entirety with 27 28 prejudice as to all plaintiff's claims, actions and causes of action asserted against 26480395 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL (FRCP Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)) 1 2 defendants. Each party is to bear its own costs and fees, including, but not limited to, attorney's fees and expert fees. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the action for 90 3 4 5 days following the entry of this Order (unless extended) for the purposes of enforcing the terms of the parties’ settlement agreement. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: July 29, 2022 8 9 Honorable James V. Selna 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 26480395 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL (FRCP Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii))

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?