Melissa Miller v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation

Filing 42

ORDER GRANTING Stipulation to Dismiss Action With Prejudice Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (Doc. 41 ) by Judge Josephine L. Staton as follow: NMAC is dismissed from this action with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); The Parties shall bea r their own fees and costs, including all attorneys' fees, incurred in connection with this action; and The Court shall retain jurisdiction for purpose of enforcing the terms of the settlement agreement entered into by the Parties. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

Download PDF
1 2 JS-6 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 MELISSA MILLER, 13 Plaintiff, 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION Defendants. Case No.: 8:21-cv-00691-JLS-KES ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (Doc. 41) 1 The Court having considered the Stipulation to Dismiss Action With 2 Prejudice Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) entered 3 into by and between Plaintiff Melissa Miller and Defendant Nissan Motor 4 Acceptance Company, LLC s/h/a Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation 5 (“NMAC”) (Doc. 41), and good cause appearing therefor, 6 The Stipulation is APPROVED; 7 NMAC is dismissed from this action with prejudice pursuant to Federal 8 9 10 11 12 13 Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); The Parties shall bear their own fees and costs, including all attorneys’ fees, incurred in connection with this action; and The Court shall retain jurisdiction for purpose of enforcing the terms of the settlement agreement entered into by the Parties. IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: April 29, 2022 HON. JOSEPHINE L. STATON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?