Jenale Nielsen v. Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. et al

Filing 102

FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER 93 , 98 by Judge David O. Carter. The Court awards $2,375,000.00 in attorneys fees, and $191,937.71 for reimbursement of costs. The Court finds the foregoing amounts to be fair and reasonable. Payment of these awards shall be made pursuant to the procedures in Section 8.2 of the Settlement Agreement. The Court awards a Service Award of $5,000.00 to Plaintiff Jenale Nielsen. The Court finds this amount is justified by Plaintiffs service to the Settlement Class. Payment shall be made from the Settlement Fund pursuant to the procedures in Section 8.3 of the Settlement Agreement. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb)

JS-6

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9

JENALE NIELSEN, individually and on
behalf of others similarly situated,

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiff,
vs.
WALT DISNEY PARKS AND
RESORTS U.S., Inc., a Florida
Corporation, and DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive,
Defendants.

Case No.: 8:21-cv-02055-DOC-ADS
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER
[93][98]
Judge: Hon. David O. Carter
Courtroom: 9D

1

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s unopposed motion requesting an order granting

2

Final Approval of the proposed Class Action Settlement Agreement (“the Settlement

3

Agreement”) between Plaintiff Jenale Nielsen (“Plaintiff”), individually and on

4

behalf of the proposed Settlement Class, and Defendant Walt Disney Parks and

5

Resorts U.S., Inc. (“Defendant”) (together with Plaintiff, the “Parties), as fair,

6

reasonable, and adequate, awarding attorneys’ fees and costs to Settlement Class

7

Counsel as outlined herein, and awarding a service award to Plaintiff as detailed

8

below.
On October 16, 2023, the Court granted preliminary approval to the Parties’

9
10

proposed Class Action Settlement Agreement. ECF No. 92.

11

Commencing on September 15, 2023, pursuant to the notice requirements in

12

the Settlement Agreement and the Preliminary Approval Order, Epiq Class Action

13

and Claims Solutions, Inc. (“Epiq”) provided Notice1 to the Settlement Class

14

members in compliance with Section 4 of the Settlement Agreement and the Class

15

Notice plan, due process, and Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The

16

notice:
(a)

17

fully and accurately informed Settlement Class members about this
case and the existence and terms of the Settlement Agreement;

18
(b)

19

advised Settlement Class members of their right to request exclusion

20

from the Settlement and provided sufficient information so that

21

Settlement Class members were able to decide whether to accept the

22

benefits offered, exclude themselves from the Settlement and pursue

23

their own remedies, or object to the proposed settlement;

24
25
26
27
28

Unless otherwise defined herein, all terms capitalized herein shall have the
definitions provided in the Settlement Agreement.

1

2

1

(c)

provided procedures for Settlement Class members to file written

2

objections to the proposed Settlement, to appear at the Final Approval

3

Hearing, and to state objections to the proposed settlement; and

4

(d)

provided the time, date, and place of the Final Approval Hearing.

5

On February 20, 2024, the Court held a Final Approval Hearing to determine

6

whether the proposed Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate and whether

7

judgment should be entered. The Court has reviewed Plaintiffs’ Motion for Final

8

Approval of Class Action Settlement and Plaintiffs’ Motion for an Award off

9

Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, and A Service Award (together, the “Motions”) and all

10

supporting materials, including but not limited to the Settlement Agreement and the

11

exhibits thereto. The Court has also considered the oral argument of counsel. Based

12

on this review and the findings below, the Court finds good cause to grant the

13

Motions.

14

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

15

1.

16
17

The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this litigation, all

claims raised therein, and all Parties thereto, including the Settlement Class.
2.

The Court has carefully reviewed all of the terms of the proposed

18

Settlement Agreement, all corresponding and supporting documents attached

19

thereto, the Motions and corresponding papers filed therewith, including the

20

declarations by counsel and Epic Systems, Inc. Based on its review of these

21

documents, the Court finds the Settlement Agreement to be fair, reasonable, and

22

adequate, and the result of vigilant, informed, non-collusive arm’s-length

23

negotiations overseen by an experienced, highly qualified neutral mediator, the

24

Honorable Judge Jay Gandhi (Ret.). The Court further finds that the Settlement

25

Agreement is the result of substantial discovery and the parties’ knowledge of the

26

strengths and weaknesses of the case. The relief provided by the Settlement

27

Agreement outweighs the substantial cost, delay, and risks presented by further

28

3

1

prosecution of the issues during pre-trial, trial, and possible appeal. Based on these

2

factors, the Court finds that the terms of the Settlement Agreement meet the criteria

3

for final settlement approval and are fair, reasonable, and adequate.

4

3.

The Court hereby GRANTS final approval of the Settlement

5

Agreement in full, including but not limited to the releases therein and the

6

procedures for effecting the Settlement. All Settlement Class members who have

7

not excluded themselves from the Settlement Class are bound by this Final Judgment

8

and Order.
Objections And Requests For Exclusion

9
10

4.

No one objected to the Settlement in accordance with the manner set

11

forth in the Settlement Agreement. All Settlement Class Members have therefore

12

waived all objections to the Settlement.

13

5.

Seven persons made valid and timely requests to be excluded from

14

the settlement and the Settlement Class (“Opt-Out Class Members”). The Opt-Out

15

Class Members are not bound by the Settlement Agreement and this Final

16

Judgment and Order and shall not be entitled to any of the benefits afforded to

17

Settlement Class members under the Settlement Agreement.

18

Certification of the Settlement Class

19
20

6.

Solely for purposes of the Settlement Agreement and this Final

Judgment and Order, the Court hereby certifies the following Settlement Class:

21

Settlement Class:

22

All Persons who purchased a Dream Key.

23

Specifically excluded from the Settlement Class are (1) any Judge or Magistrate

24

Judge presiding over this Action and members of their families; (2) Defendant;

25

(3) Persons who properly executed and filed a timely request for exclusion from the

26

class; and (4) the legal representatives, successors, or assigns of any such excluded

27

persons. The Settlement Class is estimated to include 103,431 individuals.

28

4

1

7.

The Court incorporates its preliminary conclusions in the Preliminary

2

Approval Order regarding the satisfaction of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(a).

3

Specifically, the Court finds, for settlement purposes, that: (1) the Settlement Class

4

is sufficiently numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable; (2) there are

5

questions of law or fact common to the Settlement Class; (3) the Class

6

Representative’s claims are typical of the Settlement Class; and (4) the Class

7

Representative and her Counsel fairly and adequately protect the interests of the

8

Settlement Class.

9
10
11
12

8.

The Court grants final approval to Jenale Nielsen as the Class

Representative of the Settlement Class.
9.

The Court grants final approval to Cafferty Clobes Meriwether &

Sprengel LLP and Ventura Hersey & Muller, LLP as Settlement Class Counsel.
Notice and Administration

13
14

10.

The Court finds that the Class Notice plan provided for in the

15

Settlement Agreement and effectuated pursuant to the Preliminary Approval Order:

16

(i) was the best notice practicable under the circumstances; (ii) was reasonably

17

calculated to provide, and did provide, due and sufficient notice to the Settlement

18

Class regarding the existence and nature of this case, certification of the Settlement

19

Class for settlement purposes only, the existence and terms of the Settlement

20

Agreement, and the rights of Settlement Class members to exclude themselves from

21

the settlement, to object and appear at the Final Approval Hearing, and to receive

22

benefits under the Settlement Agreement; and (iii) satisfied the requirements of the

23

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the United States Constitution, and all other

24

applicable law.

25
26
27
28

Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, and Service Award
11.

Plaintiff asks the Court for an attorneys’ fees award of $2,375,000.00.

(Dkt. 93.) The requested fee award would constitute 25% of the total class benefit,
5

1

which is $9,500,000.00. Plaintiff also seeks $191,937.71 for reimbursement of

2

litigation costs and expenses.

3

12.

The Court awards $2,375,000.00 in attorneys’ fees, and $191,937.71

4

for reimbursement of costs. The Court finds the foregoing amounts to be fair and

5

reasonable. Payment of these awards shall be made pursuant to the procedures in

6

Section 8.2 of the Settlement Agreement.

7

13.

The Court awards a Service Award of $5,000.00 to Plaintiff Jenale

8

Nielsen. The Court finds this amount is justified by Plaintiff’s service to the

9

Settlement Class. Payment shall be made from the Settlement Fund pursuant to the

10

procedures in Section 8.3 of the Settlement Agreement.
Release

11
12

14.

Each Settlement Class member, including the Class Representative,

13

are: (1) deemed to have completely and unconditionally released, forever discharged

14

and acquitted Defendant and the other Released Parties from any and all of the

15

Released Claims (including unknown claims) as defined in the Settlement

16

Agreement; and (2) barred and permanently enjoined from asserting, instituting, or

17

prosecuting, either directly or indirectly, these claims. The full terms of the release

18

described in this paragraph are set forth in Section 3 of the Settlement Agreement

19

and are specifically approved and incorporated herein by this reference (the

20

“Release”). In addition, Class Representative and settlement Class Members are

21

deemed to have waived (i) the provisions of California Civil Code § 1542, which

22

provides that a general release does not extend to claims that the creditor or releasing

23

party does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing

24

the release and that, if known by him or her, would have materially affected his or

25

her settlement with the debtor or released party, and (ii) and all similar federal or

26

state laws, rules, or legal principles of any other jurisdiction similar, comparable, or

27

equivalent to California Civil Code § 1542.

28

6

1

15.

The Settlement Agreement and this Final Judgment and Order apply to

2

all claims or causes of action settled under the Settlement Agreement and bind Class

3

Representative and all Settlement Class members who did not properly request

4

exclusion. The Settlement Agreement and this Final Judgment and Order shall have

5

maximum res judicata, collateral estoppel, and all other preclusive effect in any and

6

all causes of action, claims for relief, suits, demands, petitions, or any other

7

challenges or allegations that arise out of or relate to the subject matter of this case.

8

Other Provisions

9

16.

The Court directs the Parties and their counsel to implement and

10

consummate the Settlement Agreement and make available to Settlement Class

11

members the relief provided for therein, in accordance with the Settlement

12

Agreement’s terms and provisions.

13

17.

The Settlement Agreement and this Final Judgment and Order, and all

14

documents, supporting materials, representations, statements and proceedings

15

relating to the settlement, are not, and shall not be construed as, used as, or deemed

16

evidence of, any admission by or against Defendant of liability, fault, wrongdoing,

17

or violation of any law, or of the validity or certifiability for litigation purposes of

18

the Settlement Class or any claims that were or could have been asserted in this case.

19

18.

The Settlement Agreement and this Final Judgment and Order, and all

20

documents, supporting materials, representations, statements and proceedings

21

relating to the Settlement shall not be offered or received into evidence, and are not

22

admissible into evidence, in any action or proceeding, except that the Settlement

23

Agreement and this Final Judgment and Order may be filed in any action by any

24

Defendant or the Settlement Class members seeking to enforce the Settlement

25

Agreement or the Judgment and Order.

26
27
28

19.

If the Effective Date does not occur for any reason, this case will revert

to the status that existed before the Settlement Agreement’s execution date and the
7

1

Parties shall be restored to their respective positions in the litigation as if the

2

Settlement Agreement had never been entered into. No term or draft of the

3

Settlement Agreement, or any part of the Parties’ settlement discussions,

4

negotiations, or documentation, will have any effect or be admissible in evidence for

5

any purpose in the litigation.

6

20.

Without affecting the finality of this Final Judgment and Order, the

7

Court will retain jurisdiction over this case and the Parties with respect to the

8

interpretation, implementation, and enforcement of the Settlement Agreement for all

9

purposes.

10

21.

11
12
13

The Court hereby dismisses this case in its entirety with prejudice, and

without fees or costs, except as otherwise provided for herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Court hereby enters judgment in this matter
pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

14
15
16

DATED: March 4, 2024
HON. DAVID O. CARTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

8