Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank v. American Financial Network, Inc.

Filing 37

ORDER RE: STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott re Stipulation for Protective Order 36 . The Court has read and considered the parties' Stipulated Protective Order and, good cause appearing, orders that: The Stipulated Protective Order (Dkt. 36) is hereby approved and entered. (es)

Download PDF
1 MORTGAGE RECOVERY LAW GROUP, LLP PAUL A. LEVIN (State Bar No. 229077) 2 LAUREN M. GIBBS (State Bar No. 251569) 3 550 North Brand Boulevard, Suite 1100 Glendale, California 91203 4 Telephone: (818) 630-7900 Facsimile: (818) 630-7920 5 e-mail: plevin@themrlg.com, lgibbs@themrlg.com 6 FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE 7 CORPORATION 8 JOHN STUART TONKINSON (admitted pro 3501 Fairfax Avenue, Room B-7052 9 Arlington, VA 22226 10 Telephone: (703) 562-2490 e-mail: jtonkinson@fdic.gov 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff Federal Deposit 12 Insurance Corporation as Receiver 13 for Washington Mutual Bank 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS RECEIVER FOR 18 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, 19 Plaintiff, 20 21 vs. 22 23 AMERICAN FINANCIAL NETWORK, INC., a California 24 corporation 25 26 27 28 Defendant. Case No.8:22-cv-00281-SSS-KES [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Assigned to: District Judge Hon. Sunshine S. Sykes Magistrate Judge Hon. Karen E. Scott 1 The Court has read and considered the parties’ Stipulated Protective Order 2 and, good cause appearing, orders that: 3 The Stipulated Protective Order (Dkt. 36) is hereby approved and entered. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: August 25, 2022 ________________________ Honorable Karen E. Scott United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?