Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank v. American Financial Network, Inc.
Filing
37
ORDER RE: STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott re Stipulation for Protective Order 36 . The Court has read and considered the parties' Stipulated Protective Order and, good cause appearing, orders that: The Stipulated Protective Order (Dkt. 36) is hereby approved and entered. (es)
1 MORTGAGE RECOVERY LAW GROUP, LLP
PAUL A. LEVIN (State Bar No. 229077)
2
LAUREN M. GIBBS (State Bar No. 251569)
3 550 North Brand Boulevard, Suite 1100
Glendale, California 91203
4
Telephone: (818) 630-7900 Facsimile: (818) 630-7920
5 e-mail: plevin@themrlg.com, lgibbs@themrlg.com
6
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
7 CORPORATION
8 JOHN STUART TONKINSON (admitted pro
3501 Fairfax Avenue, Room B-7052
9 Arlington, VA 22226
10 Telephone: (703) 562-2490
e-mail: jtonkinson@fdic.gov
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff Federal Deposit
12 Insurance Corporation as Receiver
13 for Washington Mutual Bank
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17 FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION AS RECEIVER FOR
18
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK,
19
Plaintiff,
20
21
vs.
22
23 AMERICAN FINANCIAL
NETWORK, INC., a California
24 corporation
25
26
27
28
Defendant.
Case No.8:22-cv-00281-SSS-KES
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Assigned to:
District Judge Hon. Sunshine S. Sykes
Magistrate Judge Hon. Karen E. Scott
1
The Court has read and considered the parties’ Stipulated Protective Order
2 and, good cause appearing, orders that:
3
The Stipulated Protective Order (Dkt. 36) is hereby approved and entered.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6 Dated: August 25, 2022
________________________
Honorable Karen E. Scott
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?