United States of America v. 47,839.2012 Tether digital currency
Filing
16
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before August 15, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (iv)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
8:22-cv-00981-SPG-KES
Title
United States of America v. Approximately 40.997711 Ethereum Digital Currency
Present: The Honorable
Date
SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Patricia Gomez
Not applicable
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Proceedings:
August 1, 2022
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
[In Chambers] Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack
of Prosecution
Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed
for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent
power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).
The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own
motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before August 15, 2022, why
this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand
submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to
respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.
Defendant Approximately 40.99711 Ethereum Digital Currency did not answer
the complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R.
Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by
dismissing the complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
:
Initials of Preparer
CV 90 (10/08)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
PG
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?