Darrell Stuart v. Foster and Monroe, LLC
Filing
7
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): Order to Show Cause Why Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Timely Serve Defendant by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, on or before September 29, 2022, Plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to timely serve Defendant. [See document for further information.] (es)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. 8:22-cv-01152-KES
Date: September 15, 2022
Title: Darrell Stuart v. Foster and Monroe, LLC
PRESENT:
THE HONORABLE KAREN E. SCOTT, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Jazmin Dorado
Courtroom Clerk
Not Present
Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR
PLAINTIFF:
None Present
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR
DEFENDANTD:
None Present
PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS):
Order to Show Cause Why Action Should
Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Timely
Serve Defendant
Plaintiff Darrell Stuart (“Plaintiff”) filed this action on June 13, 2022. (Dkt. 1.) Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) generally requires plaintiffs to serve defendants with process
within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Although that 90-day deadline expired on September
12, 2022, Plaintiff has not filed any proof of service as of the date of this order.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, on or before September 29, 2022, Plaintiff shall
show cause why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to timely serve
Defendant.
Initials of Deputy Clerk JD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?