Darrell Stuart v. Foster and Monroe, LLC

Filing 7

MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): Order to Show Cause Why Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Timely Serve Defendant by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, on or before September 29, 2022, Plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to timely serve Defendant. [See document for further information.] (es)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. 8:22-cv-01152-KES

Date: September 15, 2022

Title: Darrell Stuart v. Foster and Monroe, LLC
PRESENT:
THE HONORABLE KAREN E. SCOTT, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Jazmin Dorado
Courtroom Clerk

Not Present
Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR
PLAINTIFF:
None Present

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR
DEFENDANTD:
None Present

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS):

Order to Show Cause Why Action Should
Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Timely
Serve Defendant

Plaintiff Darrell Stuart (“Plaintiff”) filed this action on June 13, 2022. (Dkt. 1.) Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) generally requires plaintiffs to serve defendants with process
within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Although that 90-day deadline expired on September
12, 2022, Plaintiff has not filed any proof of service as of the date of this order.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, on or before September 29, 2022, Plaintiff shall
show cause why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to timely serve
Defendant.

Initials of Deputy Clerk JD