Kawanna-Shawntaye Gritney v. State of California et al

Filing 51

ORDER ACCEPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Judge Mark C. Scarsi re Report and Recommendation 49 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:1) The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 49 ) is accepted; 2) Defendant State of Cal ifornia's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 14 ) is granted; 3) Defendant Devon Ramos, Daniel Singer, and Louis Amaya's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 25 ) is granted; 4) Defendants Victor Acevedo and David Slayton's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 40 ) is granted; 5) Defendants Victor Acevedo and David Slayton's Request for Judicial Notice (Dkt. No. 41 ) is denied; 6) Plaintiff's Request for Judicial Notice (Dkt. No. 44 ) is granted; 7) The Complaint (Dkt. No. 1 ) and Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 18 ) are dismissed without leave to amend; and 8) Judgment is to be entered accordingly. (kh)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KAWANNA-SHAWNTAYE GRITNEY,

12

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14
15

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Case No. 8:23-00479 MCS (ADS)

ORDER ACCEPTING UNITED STATES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION

Defendants.

16
17

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Defendant State of

18

California’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 14), Defendants Devon Ramos, Daniel Singer,

19

and Louis Amaya’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 25), Defendants Victor Acevedo and

20

David Slayton’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 40), Plaintiff’s oppositions to the motions

21

to dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 16, 28, 43), all supporting filings (Dkt. Nos. 29, 41, 44, 46), the

22

Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 49), and

23

Plaintiff’s Objection to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate

24

Judge. (Dkt. No. 50.) The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of

1

the Report and Recommendation to which objections were made and overrules the

2

objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate

3

Judge.

4

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

5

1.

The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 49) is accepted;

6

2.

Defendant State of California’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 14) is granted;

7

3.

Defendant Devon Ramos, Daniel Singer, and Louis Amaya’s Motion to
Dismiss (Dkt. No. 25) is granted;

4.

Defendants Victor Acevedo and David Slayton’s Motion to Dismiss
(Dkt. No. 40) is granted;

5.

Defendants Victor Acevedo and David Slayton’s Request for Judicial
Notice (Dkt. No. 41) is denied;

11

6.

Plaintiff’s Request for Judicial Notice (Dkt. No. 44) is granted;

12

7.

The Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) and Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 18) are
dismissed without leave to amend; and

8.

Judgment is to be entered accordingly.

8
9
10

13
14
15
16

DATED: February 6, 2024

___________________________
THE HONORABLE MARK C. SCARSI
United States District Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

2