John Lee v. Hee Yong Kim et al

Filing 13

MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge David O. Carter. The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS Plaintiff's counsel to submit a response in writing no later than November 16, 2023 to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. [See document for further information.] (es)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No.

8:23-cv-01541-DOC-JDE

Title

John Lee v. Hee Yong Kim et al.

Present: The Honorable

Date

November 14, 2023

DAVID O. CARTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Karlen Dubon

None Present

__________

Deputy Clerk

Court Reporter / Recorder

Tape No.

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

None Present

None Present

PROCEEDINGS:

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR
LACK OF PROSECUTION

The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS Plaintiff’s counsel to submit a response
in writing no later than November 16, 2023 to show cause why this action should not be
dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response, the Court will
consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before
the above date:
X
X
X

Answer to the complaint;
Request for Entry of Default; or
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (F.R.Civ.P. 41)

It is plaintiff's responsibility to respond promptly to all Orders and to prosecute the action
diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time to respond. If
necessary, plaintiffs must also pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon the default of any
defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by the Court.
Local Rule 7-1.
Failure to respond by the date above will result in a Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution.

Initial of Deputy Clerk

CV-90 (06/04)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

:

-

kdu

Page 1 of 1