Mariza Zamora v. Victoria's Secret Stores, LLC et al

Filing 43

MINUTES (In Chambers) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Regarding the Dismissal of Defendant Padin by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why defendant Padin should not be dismissed. Plaintiff shall file a written response to this Order no later than seven days from the date of this Order. Failure to file a timely response will result in defendant Padin being dismissed from this action. (rolm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL Case No. SACV 23-01679-KK-DFMx Date: August 29, 2024 Title: Mariza Zamora v. Victoria’s Secret Stores, LLC, et al. Present: The Honorable KENLY KIYA KATO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Noe Ponce Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present Proceedings: (In Chambers) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Regarding the Dismissal of Defendant Padin On August 3, 2023, plaintiff Mariza Zamora (“Plaintiff”) filed the operative First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) asserting general negligence and premises liability claims against defendants Victoria Secret Stores, LLC and Nicolette Padin (“Defendants”) in the Superior Court of California, County of Orange. ECF Docket No. (“Dkt.”) 1-2. The claims in the FAC arise out of an alleged incident on August 3, 2021, when a sign fell and hit Plaintiff while shopping at Defendants’ store, “causing severe injuries.” Dkt. 1-1. On September 6, 2023, Defendants filed a Notice of Removal asserting diversity jurisdiction. Dkt. 1. In the Joint Case Management Statement, Plaintiff appeared to concede defendant Padin is not a proper party because Padin was not present when the alleged incident occurred, nor had she ever worked on the premises. 1 See dkt. 14 at 2. While Plaintiff stated she would “ascertain if joinder is warranted” see id., to date, Plaintiff has neither dismissed defendant Padin nor filed an update regarding whether defendant Padin is a proper party. /// /// /// 1 The Court is not pleased that the parties have not filed a stipulation to dismiss Padin. Page 1 of 2 CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk NP Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why defendant Padin should not be dismissed. Plaintiff shall file a written response to this Order no later than seven days from the date of this Order. Failure to file a timely response will result in defendant Padin being dismissed from this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. Page 2 of 2 CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk NP

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?