State Farm General Insurance Company et al v. Techtronic Industries North America, Inc. et al

Filing 93

JUDGMENT by Judge Fred W. Slaughter, Related to: Jury Verdict (Proposed) 86 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDICATED, AND DECREED that, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 58, Plaintiffs shall have and recover nothing by reason of their Complaint against Defendants in the above-captioned matter and Defendants shall have and recover from Plaintiffs any and all costs and expenses to which Defendants are entitled. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Case No. 8:23-cv-01731-FWS-DFM JUDGMENT 14 Plaintiffs, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 v. TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES NORTH AMERICA, INC., a Delaware corporation, and HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendants. 22 23 24 This action came on regularly for trial on January 7, 2025, in Department 25 10D of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, the 26 Honorable Fred W. Slaughter presiding. Plaintiff State Farm General Insurance 27 Company and Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company 28 1 JUDGMENT 1 (together, “Plaintiffs”) were represented by Brian S. Letofsky and Dominic J. 2 Fiore from Watkins & Letofsky, LLP. Defendant Techtronic Industries North 3 America, Inc., and Defendant Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., (together, “Defendants”) 4 were represented by Jeffrey R. Williams and David W. Kempen of Riley Safer 5 Holmes & Cancila LLP. 6 On January 7, 2025, a jury of eight persons was regularly impaneled and 7 sworn. Witnesses were sworn and testified. After hearing the evidence and the 8 arguments of counsel, the jury was duly instructed by the court and the cause was 9 submitted to the jury with directions to return a verdict. The jury deliberated and 10 thereafter returned to the court with its unanimous verdict on January 15, 2025. 11 (Dkt. 86.) 12 On January 17, 2025, Defendants lodged a proposed judgment. (Dkt. 92.) 13 Plaintiffs did not object to Defendants’ proposed judgment in the timeframe set by 14 the court. (See Dkt. 91; see also generally Dkt.) Therefore, in accordance with 15 the jury’s verdict, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDICATED, AND 16 DECREED that, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 58, Plaintiffs 17 shall have and recover nothing by reason of their Complaint against Defendants in 18 the above-captioned matter and Defendants shall have and recover from Plaintiffs 19 any and all costs and expenses to which Defendants are entitled. Judgment is 20 hereby entered in favor of Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 Dated: January 28, 2025 ______________________________ Hon. Fred W. Slaughter UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26 27 28 2 JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?