State Farm General Insurance Company et al v. Techtronic Industries North America, Inc. et al
Filing
93
JUDGMENT by Judge Fred W. Slaughter, Related to: Jury Verdict (Proposed) 86 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDICATED, AND DECREED that, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 58, Plaintiffs shall have and recover nothing by reason of their Complaint against Defendants in the above-captioned matter and Defendants shall have and recover from Plaintiffs any and all costs and expenses to which Defendants are entitled. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
STATE FARM GENERAL
INSURANCE COMPANY and
STATE FARM MUTUAL
AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Case No. 8:23-cv-01731-FWS-DFM
JUDGMENT
14
Plaintiffs,
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
v.
TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES
NORTH AMERICA, INC., a Delaware
corporation, and HOME DEPOT
U.S.A., INC., a Delaware corporation,
Defendants.
22
23
24
This action came on regularly for trial on January 7, 2025, in Department
25
10D of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, the
26
Honorable Fred W. Slaughter presiding. Plaintiff State Farm General Insurance
27
Company and Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
28
1
JUDGMENT
1
(together, “Plaintiffs”) were represented by Brian S. Letofsky and Dominic J.
2
Fiore from Watkins & Letofsky, LLP. Defendant Techtronic Industries North
3
America, Inc., and Defendant Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., (together, “Defendants”)
4
were represented by Jeffrey R. Williams and David W. Kempen of Riley Safer
5
Holmes & Cancila LLP.
6
On January 7, 2025, a jury of eight persons was regularly impaneled and
7
sworn. Witnesses were sworn and testified. After hearing the evidence and the
8
arguments of counsel, the jury was duly instructed by the court and the cause was
9
submitted to the jury with directions to return a verdict. The jury deliberated and
10
thereafter returned to the court with its unanimous verdict on January 15, 2025.
11
(Dkt. 86.)
12
On January 17, 2025, Defendants lodged a proposed judgment. (Dkt. 92.)
13
Plaintiffs did not object to Defendants’ proposed judgment in the timeframe set by
14
the court. (See Dkt. 91; see also generally Dkt.) Therefore, in accordance with
15
the jury’s verdict, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDICATED, AND
16
DECREED that, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 58, Plaintiffs
17
shall have and recover nothing by reason of their Complaint against Defendants in
18
the above-captioned matter and Defendants shall have and recover from Plaintiffs
19
any and all costs and expenses to which Defendants are entitled. Judgment is
20
hereby entered in favor of Defendants.
21
22
23
24
25
Dated: January 28, 2025
______________________________
Hon. Fred W. Slaughter
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
26
27
28
2
JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?