Ameris Bank v. M and W Shaban Inc et al
Filing
16
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge James V. Selna. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 5/17/2024. [See document for further information.] (es)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
8:23-cv-02397-JVS(DFMx)
Title
Ameris Bank v. M and W Shaban Inc et al
Present: The
Honorable
Date
May 10, 2024
James V. Selna, U.S. District Court Judge
Elsa Vargas
Not Present
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Not Present
Not Present
Proceedings:
(IN CHAMBERS)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL
FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION
The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than
May 17, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a
written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate
response to this OSC, on or before the above date:
X
Answer by the defendant(s) or plaintiff's request for entry of default.
Absent a showing of good cause, an action shall be dismissed if the summons and complaint have
not been served upon all defendants within 90 days after the filing of the complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m)
The Court may dismiss the action prior to the expiration of such time, however, if plaintiff(s) has/have not
diligently prosecuted the action.
It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to respond promptly to all orders and to prosecute the action
diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time under Rule 55 remedies
promptly upon default of any defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved
by the Court. Local Rule 7-1
It is so Ordered.
CV-90 (06/04)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?