Theresa Brooke v. DHSM LLC, et al

Filing 17

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND OBEY COURT ORDER by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth: Plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and obey a court order. Plaintiff must file a written response by no later than June 12, 2024. Plaintiff may respond to this order by filing an application for default judgment. (kh)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No.: 8:24-00699 ADS

Date: June 5, 2024

Title: Theresa Brooke v. DHSM LLC, et al.

Present: The Honorable Autumn D. Spaeth, United States Magistrate Judge
Kristee Hopkins
Deputy Clerk

None Reported
Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s):
None Present

Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s):
None Present

Proceedings:

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE AND OBEY COURT ORDER

On May 13, 2024, the Clerk’s office entered default against defendant DHSM
LLC. (Dkt. No. 14.) The Court ordered Plaintiff Theresa Brooke to file an application for
default judgment by no later than May 28, 2024. (Dkt. No. 16.) As of this date, Plaintiff
has not filed an application for default judgment.
Plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed under
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and obey a court order.
Plaintiff must file a written response by no later than June 12, 2024. Plaintiff
may respond to this order by filing an application for default judgment.
Plaintiff is expressly warned that failure to timely file a response to
this order may result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice for
failure to prosecute and obey a Court order pursuant to Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 41(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Initials of Clerk kh

CV-90 (03/15)—MM

Civil Minutes – General

Page 1 of 1