431 S Almont LLC v. City of Beverly Hills et al

Filing 40

[IN CHAMBERS] Order Regarding Order to Show Cause why the related cases should not be consolidated by Judge James V. Selna. The Court ORDERS City of Beverly Hills to show in writing by no later than March 17, 2025 why the Court should not consolidate the cases. Almont has until March 24 to file its responsive brief. Accordingly, the Court VACATES the March 24, 2025 scheduling conference, to be reset after Almont files an amended complaint. [See document for further information.] (es)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.

8:24-cv-02031-JVS-ADS

Title

431 S Almont LLC v. City of Beverly Hills et al

Present: The Honorable

Date

March 11, 2025

James V. Selna, U.S. District Court Judge

Elsa Vargas

Not Present

Deputy Clerk

Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present

Not Present

Proceedings:

[IN CHAMBERS] Order Regarding Order to Show Cause why the
related cases should not be consolidated

Plaintiff 431 S Almont (“Almont”) has two pending cases with this Court: (1)
Case No. 8:24-cv-02031-JVS-ADS and (2) Case No. 8:24-cv-02603-JVS-ADS. During
the March 10, 2025 hearing, the Court asked the parties to consolidate the two cases.
While Almont supported the consolidation and agreed to file a single amended
complaint, Defendant City of Beverly Hills opposed.
As a result, the Court issues this order to show cause (“OSC”). The Court
ORDERS City of Beverly Hills to show in writing by no later than March 17, 2025 why
the Court should not consolidate the cases. Almont has until March 24 to file its
responsive brief.
During the hearing, the Court also granted Almont leave to amend its Complaint.
Accordingly, the Court VACATES the March 24, 2025 scheduling conference, to be
reset after Almont files an amended complaint.

CV-90 (06/04)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Page 1 of 1