Berryman v. Wong

Filing 396

ORDER following Confidential Status Conference; Hearing Date: December 17, 2008, Time: 11:00 a.m., signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 01/06/2009. (Martin, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Respondent 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 95dp5309.OFollConfStatusConf.Ber.wpd IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RODNEY BERRYMAN, Sr., Petitioner, vs. ROBERT WONG, as Acting Warden of San Quentin State Prison, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:95-cv-05309-AWI DEATH PENALTY CASE ORDER FOLLOWING CONFIDENTIAL STATUS CONFERENCE HEARING DATE: December 17, 2008 TIME: 11:00 a.m. On several occasions during the course of the litigation of this case, Petitioner Rodney Berryman, Sr. ("Berryman"), has submitted pro se filings, filed and maintained under seal, seeking to have courtappointed counsel relieved on the basis of alleged irreconcilable disagreements over the conduct of the litigation. Following a resurgence of correspondence from Berryman, the Court appointed Assistant Federal Defender Joseph Schlesinger as independent counsel, to examine the disagreement and to advise the Court as necessary. In ex parte proceedings conducted on December 17, 2008, Mr. Schlesinger requested authority under Rule 6 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, to issue a subpoena duces tecum for reports, evidence, and other materials in the possession of the Kern County Sheriff-Coroner. The request is supported by an adequate showing of need to examine such materials in furtherance of the court-ordered inquiry. The Court granted the request for authorization under Rule 6 during the proceedings conducted on December 17, 2008, and hereby confirms that authorization, entering this public order for the benefit of Respondent Robert Wong, as Acting Warden of San Quentin 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 State Prison (the "Warden:) as well as the Kern County Sheriff-Coroner to clarify Mr. Schlesinger's role and authority . The Court does not anticipate that Mr. Schlesinger's activities will impact the schedule for the continued litigation of Claim 19, and orders the depositions of David Armendariz and George Peterson to proceed as scheduled. Mr. Schlesinger will file a confidential status report to apprise the Court of his progress in examining the potential conflict between Berryman and appointed counsel within the time agreed upon at the December 17, 2008 hearing. The Court has determined that no further notice to the Warden is necessary or appropriate at this time. In the event future potential actions necessitate notice to the Warden and opportunity to be heard, the Court will provide such notice and opportunity. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: January 6, 2009 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii Anthony W. Ishii United States District Judge 95dp5309.OFollConfStatusConf.Ber.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?